From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755043AbcKNRxH (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:53:07 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:64178 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752781AbcKNRxF (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:53:05 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,491,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="30888757" From: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" To: "arnd@arndb.de" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" CC: "lenb@kernel.org" , "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" , "Gasparini, Stephane" , "philippe.longepe@linux.intel.com" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: fix intel_pstate_use_acpi_profile helper Thread-Topic: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: fix intel_pstate_use_acpi_profile helper Thread-Index: AQHSPp/xgcBuwjULKU+0rjt4fstrXw== Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:53:02 +0000 Message-ID: <1479145979.6544.19.camel@intel.com> References: <20161114164216.2657919-1-arnd@arndb.de> <1479143663.6544.11.camel@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1479143663.6544.11.camel@linux.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.54.75.13] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <5084DB92D244C143AB2954DD85749832@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id uAEHrBLY021904 On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 09:14 -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 17:41 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > The newly added function uses two different prototypes depending > > on configuration, and one of them does not match the caller: > > > > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c: In function ‘copy_cpu_funcs’: > > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:1798:2: error: too few arguments to > > function ‘intel_pstate_use_acpi_profile’ > > > > This changes it to look like the other one. > Sorry about that. Since this is a compile issue for x86 non ACPI systems, which will be a problem for git bisect, it is better to resubmit my patch with the fix. Thanks, Srinivas