linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	pc@us.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided during probe registration
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:25:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492781012.pcpyah5v9j.astroid@naverao1-tp.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc950d45-4e98-9bd7-d435-4a6005507f94@us.ibm.com>

Excerpts from Paul Clarke's message of April 21, 2017 18:41:
> a nit or two, below...
> 
> On 04/21/2017 07:32 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> index 6a128f3a7ed1..ff9b1ac72a38 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -1383,6 +1383,34 @@ bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
>>  }
>> 
>>  /*
>> + * We mainly want to ensure that the provided string is of a reasonable length
>> + * and is of the form [<mod_name>:]<sym_name>, so that this is safe to process
>> + * further.
>> + * We don't worry about invalid characters as those will just prevent
>> + * matching existing kallsyms.
>> + */
>> +bool is_valid_kprobe_symbol_name(const char *name)
>> +{
>> +	size_t sym_len;
>> +	const char *s;
>> +
>> +	s = strnchr(name, ':', MODULE_NAME_LEN + KSYM_NAME_LEN + 1);
>> +	if (s) {
>> +		sym_len = (size_t)(s - name);
>> +		if (sym_len <= 0  || sym_len >= MODULE_NAME_LEN)
> 
> "sym_len <= 0" looks odd here, since sym_len is likely unsigned and would never be less than zero, anyway.

Ugh.. habits :/
I'll wait for Masami/Michael's feedback before re-spinning.

Thanks for the review,
- Naveen

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-21 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-19 12:50 [PATCH v3 0/7] powerpc: a few kprobe fixes and refactoring Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-19 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] kprobes: convert kprobe_lookup_name() to a function Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-24 22:47   ` [v3,1/7] " Michael Ellerman
2017-04-19 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] powerpc: kprobes: fix handling of function offsets on ABIv2 Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-24 22:47   ` [v3,2/7] " Michael Ellerman
2017-04-19 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-19 14:37   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-19 16:38     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-21 13:42       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-23 15:44         ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-25  3:18           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-20  6:08   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-04-20  7:19     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-21 12:32   ` [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided during probe registration Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-21 13:11     ` Paul Clarke
2017-04-21 13:25       ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2017-04-21 13:54     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-22  5:55     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-04-23 17:41       ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-21 12:33   ` [PATCH v4 4/7] powerpc/kprobes: Use safer string functions in kprobe_lookup_name() Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-21 13:33     ` Paul Clarke
2017-04-21 13:36       ` Paul Clarke
2017-04-21 13:52       ` Paul Clarke
2017-04-23 17:09         ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-19 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] powerpc: kprobes: use " Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-21 15:06   ` David Laight
2017-04-19 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] powerpc: kprobes: factor out code to emulate instruction into a helper Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-19 14:40   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-24 22:47   ` [v3, " Michael Ellerman
2017-04-19 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] powerpc: kprobes: emulate instructions on kprobe handler re-entry Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-19 14:43   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-19 16:42     ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-20  6:11       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-04-21 13:48         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-24 22:47   ` [v3, " Michael Ellerman
2017-04-19 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] powerpc: kprobes: remove duplicate saving of msr Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-19 14:43   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-23 11:53   ` [v3,7/7] " Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1492781012.pcpyah5v9j.astroid@naverao1-tp.none \
    --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).