From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 22:09:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513001367.2981.11.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFy2-vNAXSnSBoiSfvhijKXzYVmpYr1VCOb87+tgrw0B1Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2017-12-10 at 12:30 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Confirmed, revert fixes it. You see how it moves
> > fix_processor_context
> > around #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 block? And how people forget 32-bit
> > machines exist? Aha.
> Yeah, people do.
>
> Andy?
>
> >
> > Which brings me to .. various people do automated testing of
> > kernel. Testing 32-bit kernel for boot, and both 32-bit and 64-bit
> > for
> > boot and suspend would be very nice. The last item is not hard,
> > either:
> >
> > sudo rtcwake -l -m mem -s 5
> >
> > ...should take 10 seconds or so.
> I'm told 0day does *some* suspend/resume testing, but I think it's
> pretty limited, partly because the kinds of machines it primarily
> works on don't really support suspend/resume at all.
currently, we're running suspend test on 1 platform only, with 64 bit
kernel. suspend test will be enabled on more platforms (laptops) in
next two weeks.
I will check why it does not find the first regression introduced by
ca37e57bbe0c ("x86/entry/64: Add missing irqflags tracing to
native_load_gs_index()").
> I'm also not sure
> just how many of those machines are 32-bit at all..
for this, I suppose it can be reproduced if we use 32-bit kernel and
rootfs, right? Then it's easier to enable this in 0Day.
thanks,
rui
>
> But I'm adding Zhang Rui to the cc, to see if my recollection is
> right.
>
> Because you're right, more suspend/resume automated testing would be
> good to have. And yes, people test mainly 64-bit these days.
>
> Also, I'm not even sure what the 0day rules are for just plain
> mainline. I don't tend to see a lot of breakage reports, even though
> I'd expect to. This came in from the x86 trees (and those do their
> own
> tests too, but probably not suspend/resume either), but it hit my
> tree
> fairly soon after going into the x86 -tip trees.
>
> Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-03 16:22 Linux 4.15-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2017-12-04 22:25 ` Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3 Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-04 22:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-04 22:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-04 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-05 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-09 10:33 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-09 11:41 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <CA+55aFw8tuoJ2gcXx3K2sKFf2Y9hXX4naMVQNqGOUivnjwhjkg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-09 22:01 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <CA+55aFySAdiBZhZ0PSDjH5PuvPPcMsBRXbxCkObfm1eY7gHDbQ@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-10 16:23 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-10 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-10 18:56 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-10 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-10 20:43 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-10 21:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-10 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-12 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-12 18:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-12 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-12 22:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-12 22:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-12 23:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-13 11:16 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-12-13 12:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-13 18:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-10 21:38 ` [PATCH] Fix resume on x86-32 machines Pavel Machek
2017-12-10 21:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-10 22:20 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-11 9:25 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-12-11 14:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-11 14:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-11 14:59 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-12-11 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-11 18:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-11 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-14 20:38 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-14 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-14 21:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-14 22:22 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-11 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-11 16:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-11 14:09 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2017-12-11 16:28 ` Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3 Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-12 8:00 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-06 12:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-06 12:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-06 14:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-06 12:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-12-06 12:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-06 13:09 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-12-06 14:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-07 13:33 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-12-08 10:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-13 15:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-13 16:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-13 16:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-13 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-13 18:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-13 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-13 21:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-13 22:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 11:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 12:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 15:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 15:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 15:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 16:17 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-12-15 2:07 ` [PATCH] PCI / PM: Force devices to D0 in pci_pm_thaw_noirq() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-15 14:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-15 18:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-15 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 13:24 ` Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3 Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-14 22:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 22:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-15 9:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-15 0:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 23:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-07 7:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-10 20:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-21 18:36 ` Linux 4.15-rc2 Eugene Syromiatnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513001367.2981.11.camel@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).