From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip v6 13/27] kprobes: Don't check the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 01:10:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152942462686.15209.6324404940493598980.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152942424698.15209.15245996287444292393.stgit@devbox>
Don't check the ->break_handler() from the core kprobes code,
because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.
( In followup patches we'll remove the remaining calls in low level
arch handlers as well and remove the callback altogether. )
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/kprobes.txt | 2 +-
kernel/kprobes.c | 39 +++++----------------------------------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
index 5ae80baf3921..907a3017c0f2 100644
--- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ is optimized, that modification is ignored. Thus, if you want to
tweak the kernel's execution path, you need to suppress optimization,
using one of the following techniques:
-- Specify an empty function for the kprobe's post_handler or break_handler.
+- Specify an empty function for the kprobe's post_handler.
or
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 69de130595f7..536ab451e96d 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -627,8 +627,8 @@ static void optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
(kprobe_disabled(p) || kprobes_all_disarmed))
return;
- /* Both of break_handler and post_handler are not supported. */
- if (p->break_handler || p->post_handler)
+ /* kprobes with post_handler can not be optimized */
+ if (p->post_handler)
return;
op = container_of(p, struct optimized_kprobe, kp);
@@ -1116,20 +1116,6 @@ static int aggr_fault_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(aggr_fault_handler);
-static int aggr_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- struct kprobe *cur = __this_cpu_read(kprobe_instance);
- int ret = 0;
-
- if (cur && cur->break_handler) {
- if (cur->break_handler(cur, regs))
- ret = 1;
- }
- reset_kprobe_instance();
- return ret;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(aggr_break_handler);
-
/* Walks the list and increments nmissed count for multiprobe case */
void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p)
{
@@ -1270,24 +1256,15 @@ static void cleanup_rp_inst(struct kretprobe *rp)
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(cleanup_rp_inst);
-/*
-* Add the new probe to ap->list. Fail if this is the
-* second break_handler at the address
-*/
+/* Add the new probe to ap->list */
static int add_new_kprobe(struct kprobe *ap, struct kprobe *p)
{
BUG_ON(kprobe_gone(ap) || kprobe_gone(p));
- if (p->break_handler || p->post_handler)
+ if (p->post_handler)
unoptimize_kprobe(ap, true); /* Fall back to normal kprobe */
- if (p->break_handler) {
- if (ap->break_handler)
- return -EEXIST;
- list_add_tail_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
- ap->break_handler = aggr_break_handler;
- } else
- list_add_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
+ list_add_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
if (p->post_handler && !ap->post_handler)
ap->post_handler = aggr_post_handler;
@@ -1310,8 +1287,6 @@ static void init_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *ap, struct kprobe *p)
/* We don't care the kprobe which has gone. */
if (p->post_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
ap->post_handler = aggr_post_handler;
- if (p->break_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
- ap->break_handler = aggr_break_handler;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ap->list);
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ap->hlist);
@@ -1706,8 +1681,6 @@ static int __unregister_kprobe_top(struct kprobe *p)
goto disarmed;
else {
/* If disabling probe has special handlers, update aggrprobe */
- if (p->break_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
- ap->break_handler = NULL;
if (p->post_handler && !kprobe_gone(p)) {
list_for_each_entry_rcu(list_p, &ap->list, list) {
if ((list_p != p) && (list_p->post_handler))
@@ -1911,7 +1884,6 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
rp->kp.pre_handler = pre_handler_kretprobe;
rp->kp.post_handler = NULL;
rp->kp.fault_handler = NULL;
- rp->kp.break_handler = NULL;
/* Pre-allocate memory for max kretprobe instances */
if (rp->maxactive <= 0) {
@@ -2034,7 +2006,6 @@ static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
list_for_each_entry_rcu(kp, &p->list, list)
kp->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_GONE;
p->post_handler = NULL;
- p->break_handler = NULL;
kill_optimized_kprobe(p);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-19 16:04 [PATCH -tip v6 00/27] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:04 ` [PATCH -tip v6 01/27] Documentation/kprobes: Fix to remove remaining jprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:05 ` [PATCH -tip v6 02/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:05 ` [PATCH -tip v6 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:06 ` [PATCH -tip v6 04/27] ARC: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:06 ` [PATCH -tip v6 05/27] ARM: kprobes: Remove jprobe arm implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:07 ` [PATCH -tip v6 06/27] arm64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:07 ` [PATCH -tip v6 07/27] powerpc/kprobes: Remove jprobe powerpc implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` [PATCH -tip v6 08/27] ia64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` [PATCH -tip v6 09/27] MIPS: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` [PATCH -tip v6 10/27] s390/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:09 ` [PATCH -tip v6 11/27] sh: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:09 ` [PATCH -tip v6 12/27] sparc64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-06-19 16:10 ` [PATCH -tip v6 14/27] kprobes/x86: Don't call ->break_handler() in x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:11 ` [PATCH -tip v6 15/27] ARC: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ARC kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:11 ` [PATCH -tip v6 16/27] ARM: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:12 ` [PATCH -tip v6 17/27] arm64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:12 ` [PATCH -tip v6 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in powerpc " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:13 ` [PATCH -tip v6 19/27] ia64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ia64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:13 ` [PATCH -tip v6 20/27] MIPS: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in MIPS " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:14 ` [PATCH -tip v6 21/27] s390/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in s390 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:14 ` [PATCH -tip v6 22/27] sh: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in SH " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:15 ` [PATCH -tip v6 23/27] sparc64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in sparc64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:15 ` [PATCH -tip v6 24/27] bpf: error-inject: kprobes: Clear current_kprobe and enable preempt in kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:16 ` [PATCH -tip v6 25/27] kprobes/x86: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:16 ` [PATCH -tip v6 26/27] Documentation: kprobes: Add how to change the execution path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-06-20 8:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-21 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-06-22 6:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-22 9:15 ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/Documentation: Fix various typos tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:17 ` [PATCH -tip v6 27/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe stub API Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152942462686.15209.6324404940493598980.stgit@devbox \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).