From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/skbuff: silence warnings under memory pressure
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:14:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567599263.5576.72.camel@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190904074312.GA25744@jagdpanzerIV>
On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 16:43 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/04/19 16:19), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Hmm. I need to look at this more... wake_up_klogd() queues work only once
> > on particular CPU: irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&wake_up_klogd_work));
> >
> > bool irq_work_queue()
> > {
> > /* Only queue if not already pending */
> > if (!irq_work_claim(work))
> > return false;
> >
> > __irq_work_queue_local(work);
> > }
>
> Plus one more check - waitqueue_active(&log_wait). printk() adds
> pending irq_work only if there is a user-space process sleeping on
> log_wait and irq_work is not already scheduled. If the syslog is
> active or there is noone to wakeup then we don't queue irq_work.
Another possibility for this potential livelock is that those printk() from
warn_alloc(), dump_stack() and show_mem() increase the time it needs to process
build_skb() allocation failures significantly under memory pressure. As the
result, ksoftirqd() could be rescheduled during that time via a different CPU
(this is a large x86 NUMA system anyway),
[83605.577256][ C31] run_ksoftirqd+0x1f/0x40
[83605.577256][ C31] smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
[83605.577256][ C31] kthread+0x1df/0x200
[83605.577256][ C31] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
In addition, those printk() will deal with console drivers or even a networking
console, so it is probably not unusual that it could call irq_exit()-
>__do_softirq() at one point and then this livelock.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-30 14:57 [PATCH] net/skbuff: silence warnings under memory pressure Qian Cai
2019-08-30 15:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-30 15:25 ` Qian Cai
2019-08-30 16:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-30 18:06 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-03 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-03 15:42 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-03 18:53 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-03 21:42 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-04 6:15 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 6:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04 6:54 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 7:19 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04 7:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04 12:14 ` Qian Cai [this message]
2019-09-04 14:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04 15:07 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-04 20:42 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-05 8:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-09-05 14:09 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-05 15:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-09-05 15:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-09-05 11:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-05 16:03 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-05 17:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-06 2:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-06 4:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-06 21:17 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-05 17:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-06 3:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-06 15:32 ` Petr Mladek
2019-09-09 1:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-06 14:55 ` Petr Mladek
2019-09-06 19:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-14 17:12 ` Qian Cai
2019-11-18 15:27 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-19 0:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-19 9:41 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-19 15:58 ` Qian Cai
2019-11-20 1:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-20 16:13 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-21 1:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-21 9:15 ` Petr Mladek
2019-09-04 7:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 11:59 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-04 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 12:28 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-07 11:00 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-09-04 6:15 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-02 14:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1567599263.5576.72.camel@lca.pw \
--to=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).