From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/uprobes: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:50:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160697103739.3146288.7437620795200799020.stgit@devnote2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160697102582.3146288.10127018634865687932.stgit@devnote2>
Since the insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a same prefix is repeated, we have to
check whether the insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4 instead
of insn.prefixes.nbytes.
This introduces for_each_insn_prefix() macro for this purpose.
Fixes: 2b1444983508 ("uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to install and remove uprobes breakpoints")
Reported-by: syzbot+9b64b619f10f19d19a7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Debugged-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes in v2:
- Add for_each_insn_prefix() macro and fix to check index first.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 10 ++++++----
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
index 5c1ae3eff9d4..e6b38ebd3a1c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
@@ -201,6 +201,21 @@ static inline int insn_offset_immediate(struct insn *insn)
return insn_offset_displacement(insn) + insn->displacement.nbytes;
}
+/**
+ * for_each_insn_prefix() -- Iterate prefixes in the instruction
+ * @insn: Pointer to struct insn.
+ * @idx: Index storage.
+ * @prefix: Prefix byte.
+ *
+ * Iterate prefix bytes of given @insn. Each prefix byte is stored in @prefix
+ * and the index is stored in @idx (note that this @idx is just for a cursor,
+ * do not change it.)
+ * Since prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than 4 if some prefixes are repeated,
+ * we can not use it for looping over the prefixes.
+ */
+#define for_each_insn_prefix(insn, idx, prefix) \
+ for (idx = 0; idx < 4 && (prefix = insn->prefixes.bytes[idx]) != 0; idx++)
+
#define POP_SS_OPCODE 0x1f
#define MOV_SREG_OPCODE 0x8e
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 3fdaa042823d..138bdb1fd136 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -255,12 +255,13 @@ static volatile u32 good_2byte_insns[256 / 32] = {
static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
{
+ insn_byte_t p;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+ for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
insn_attr_t attr;
- attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(insn->prefixes.bytes[i]);
+ attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
switch (attr) {
case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_ES):
case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
@@ -715,6 +716,7 @@ static const struct uprobe_xol_ops push_xol_ops = {
static int branch_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
{
u8 opc1 = OPCODE1(insn);
+ insn_byte_t p;
int i;
switch (opc1) {
@@ -746,8 +748,8 @@ static int branch_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
* Intel and AMD behavior differ in 64-bit mode: Intel ignores 66 prefix.
* No one uses these insns, reject any branch insns with such prefix.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
- if (insn->prefixes.bytes[i] == 0x66)
+ for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
+ if (p == 0x66)
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-03 4:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/insn: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-03 4:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2020-12-03 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/uprobes: " Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 12:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 12:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 16:45 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-12-03 16:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 17:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 18:10 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-12-03 18:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 18:49 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-12-04 0:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 3:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-04 11:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 0:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 0:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 15:04 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/uprobes: Do not use prefixes.nbytes when looping " tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-05 0:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-05 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-06 3:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-06 9:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-09 18:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-12-10 10:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-09 18:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-12-06 9:09 ` tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-03 4:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/insn-eval: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop " Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 15:04 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop over prefixes bytes tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-06 9:09 ` tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-03 4:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/sev-es: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 15:04 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/sev-es: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop over prefixes bytes tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-06 9:09 ` tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160697103739.3146288.7437620795200799020.stgit@devnote2 \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).