linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
To: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Cc: asutoshd@codeaurora.org, stummala@codeaurora.org,
	vbadigan@codeaurora.org, rampraka@codeaurora.org,
	sayalil@codeaurora.org, sartgarg@codeaurora.org,
	rnayak@codeaurora.org, cang@codeaurora.org,
	pragalla@codeaurora.org, nitirawa@codeaurora.org,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH V4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Update the software timeout value for sdhc
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:16:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1626435974-14462-1-git-send-email-sbhanu@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Whenever SDHC run at clock rate 50MHZ or below, the hardware data
timeout value will be 21.47secs, which is approx. 22secs and we have
a current software timeout value as 10secs. We have to set software
timeout value more than the hardware data timeout value to avioid seeing
the below register dumps.

[  332.953670] mmc2: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
[  332.959608] mmc2: sdhci: ============ SDHCI REGISTER DUMP ===========
[  332.966450] mmc2: sdhci: Sys addr:  0x00000000 | Version:  0x00007202
[  332.973256] mmc2: sdhci: Blk size:  0x00000200 | Blk cnt:  0x00000001
[  332.980054] mmc2: sdhci: Argument:  0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000027
[  332.986864] mmc2: sdhci: Present:   0x01f801f6 | Host ctl: 0x0000001f
[  332.993671] mmc2: sdhci: Power:     0x00000001 | Blk gap:  0x00000000
[  333.000583] mmc2: sdhci: Wake-up:   0x00000000 | Clock:    0x00000007
[  333.007386] mmc2: sdhci: Timeout:   0x0000000e | Int stat: 0x00000000
[  333.014182] mmc2: sdhci: Int enab:  0x03ff100b | Sig enab: 0x03ff100b
[  333.020976] mmc2: sdhci: ACmd stat: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
[  333.027771] mmc2: sdhci: Caps:      0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1:   0x0000808f
[  333.034561] mmc2: sdhci: Cmd:       0x0000183a | Max curr: 0x00000000
[  333.041359] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[0]:   0x00000900 | Resp[1]:  0x00000000
[  333.048157] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[2]:   0x00000000 | Resp[3]:  0x00000000
[  333.054945] mmc2: sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
[  333.059657] mmc2: sdhci: ADMA Err:  0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr:
0x0000000ffffff218
[  333.067178] mmc2: sdhci_msm: ----------- VENDOR REGISTER DUMP
-----------
[  333.074343] mmc2: sdhci_msm: DLL sts: 0x00000000 | DLL cfg:
0x6000642c | DLL cfg2: 0x0020a000
[  333.083417] mmc2: sdhci_msm: DLL cfg3: 0x00000000 | DLL usr ctl:
0x00000000 | DDR cfg: 0x80040873
[  333.092850] mmc2: sdhci_msm: Vndr func: 0x00008a9c | Vndr func2 :
0xf88218a8 Vndr func3: 0x02626040
[  333.102371] mmc2: sdhci: ============================================

So, set software timeout value more than hardware timeout value.

Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---

Changes since V3:
	- Addressed minor comments from Adrain Hunter and retained his
	  Acked-by Signed-off.

Changes since V2:
	- Updated 22 with 22LL to avoid compiler warning as
	  suggested by Adrian Hunter.
	- Added a check to update software data timeout value if its value
	  is less than the calculated hardware data timeout value as suggested
	  by Veerabhadrarao Badiganti.
Changes since V1:
	- Moved software data timeout update part to qcom specific file
	  as suggested by Veerabhadrarao Badiganti.
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index e44b7a6..290a14c 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -2089,6 +2089,23 @@ static void sdhci_msm_cqe_disable(struct mmc_host *mmc, bool recovery)
 	sdhci_cqe_disable(mmc, recovery);
 }
 
+static void sdhci_msm_set_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
+{
+	u32 count, start = 15;
+
+	__sdhci_set_timeout(host, cmd);
+	count = sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL);
+	/*
+	 * Update software timeout value if its value is less than hardware data
+	 * timeout value. Qcom SoC hardware data timeout value was calculated
+	 * using 4 * MCLK * 2^(count + 13). where MCLK = 1 / host->clock.
+	 */
+	if (cmd && cmd->data && host->clock > 400000 &&
+	    host->clock <= 50000000 &&
+	    ((1 << (count + start)) > (10 * host->clock)))
+		host->data_timeout = 22LL * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+}
+
 static const struct cqhci_host_ops sdhci_msm_cqhci_ops = {
 	.enable		= sdhci_msm_cqe_enable,
 	.disable	= sdhci_msm_cqe_disable,
@@ -2438,6 +2455,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_msm_ops = {
 	.irq	= sdhci_msm_cqe_irq,
 	.dump_vendor_regs = sdhci_msm_dump_vendor_regs,
 	.set_power = sdhci_set_power_noreg,
+	.set_timeout = sdhci_msm_set_timeout,
 };
 
 static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_msm_pdata = {
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member 
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-16 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-16 11:46 Shaik Sajida Bhanu [this message]
2021-08-02 10:41 ` [PATCH V4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Update the software timeout value for sdhc sbhanu
2021-08-04 11:34   ` Ulf Hansson
2021-08-26  7:43     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-03  9:01 ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1626435974-14462-1-git-send-email-sbhanu@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sbhanu@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nitirawa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=pragalla@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rampraka@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sartgarg@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sayalil@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vbadigan@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).