From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
Bernard Blackham <bernard@blackham.com.au>,
Shaw <shawv@comcast.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Screwy clock after apm suspend
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:15:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16867.57217.358323.945559@alkaid.it.uu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050111131019.GA1324@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek writes:
> Hia
>
> > > Looking harder, in arch/i386/kernel/apm.c the system time is also
> > > saved and restored in a very similar way to timer_suspend/resume.
> > > Would this account for the time drift in APM mode? (sleep time being
> > > accounted for twice?)
> >
> > No, apm.c's update to xtime is absolute, just like time.c's.
> > Doing both is pointless but not harmful. (I've already tried
> > with apm.c's xtime update commented out, but the time-warp
> > bug remained.)
> >
> > My 0.02 SEK says it's the jiffies update that's broken.
>
> Okay, can you
>
> * kill jiffie update (x86-64, too)
> * remove apm.c variant
> * test it (or make someone test it) with apm?
>
> I now see the drift with acpi, too :-(. I can do the acpi testing...
I'm away from my APM laptop until Friday, but I'll do this test then.
/Mikael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-11 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-07 18:08 Screwy clock after apm suspend Shaw
2005-01-09 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-10 2:15 ` Alex Romosan
2005-01-10 7:28 ` Shaw
2005-01-10 7:44 ` bernard
2005-01-10 10:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-10 17:48 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-01-11 0:14 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 1:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-11 3:12 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 1:16 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-01-11 3:21 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 12:36 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-11 13:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 14:15 ` Mikael Pettersson [this message]
2005-01-11 20:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 3:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-01-11 3:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 12:32 ` Mikael Pettersson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-15 18:30 Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-16 19:47 ` Alex Romosan
2004-12-29 11:38 Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-03 17:34 ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-29 0:29 Brannon Klopfer
2004-12-29 1:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16867.57217.358323.945559@alkaid.it.uu.se \
--to=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=bernard@blackham.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=shawv@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).