From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>, rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.21 06/16] cpu_opv: Provide cpu_opv system call (v8)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:17:37 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1984292897.263.1539717457933.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016081029.GA30363@jagdpanzerIV>
----- On Oct 16, 2018, at 4:10 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On (10/10/18 15:19), Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> [..]
>> +SYSCALL_DEFINE4(cpu_opv, struct cpu_op __user *, ucpuopv, int, cpuopcnt,
>> + int, cpu, int, flags)
>> +{
> [..]
>> +again:
>> + ret = cpu_opv_pin_pages(cpuopv, cpuopcnt, &vaddr_ptrs);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto end;
>> + ret = do_cpu_opv(cpuopv, cpuopcnt, &vaddr_ptrs, cpu);
>> + if (ret == -EAGAIN)
>> + retry = true;
>> +end:
>> + for (i = 0; i < vaddr_ptrs.nr_vaddr; i++) {
>> + struct vaddr *vaddr = &vaddr_ptrs.addr[i];
>> + int j;
>> +
>> + vm_unmap_user_ram((void *)vaddr->mem, vaddr->nr_pages);
>
> A dumb question.
>
> Both vm_unmap_user_ram() and vm_map_user_ram() can BUG_ON().
> So this is
> userspace -> syscall -> cpu_opv() -> vm_unmap_user_ram() -> BUG_ON()
>
> Any chance someone can exploit it?
Hi Sergey,
Let's look at vm_unmap_user_ram() and vm_map_user_ram() separately.
If we look at the input from vm_unmap_user_ram, it's called with the
following parameters by the cpu_opv system call:
for (i = 0; i < vaddr_ptrs.nr_vaddr; i++) {
struct vaddr *vaddr = &vaddr_ptrs.addr[i];
int j;
vm_unmap_user_ram((void *)vaddr->mem, vaddr->nr_pages);
[...]
}
The vaddr_ptrs array content is filled by the call to cpu_opv_pin_pages above:
ret = cpu_opv_pin_pages(cpuopv, cpuopcnt, &vaddr_ptrs);
if (ret)
goto end;
by passing the array to cpu_op_pin_pages(), which appends a virtual address at
the end of the array (on success) and increments nr_vaddr. Those virtual
addresses are returned by vm_map_user_ram(), so they are not user-controlled.
Therefore, only an internal kernel bug between vm_map_user_ram() and
vm_unmap_user_ram() should trigger the BUG_ON(). No user input is passed
to vm_unmap_user_ram().
Now, let's look at vm_map_user_ram(). It calls alloc_vmap_area(), which returns
a vmap_area. Then if vmap_page_range failed, vm_unmap_user_ram is called on the
memory that has just been returned by vm_map_user_ram. Again, only an internal
bug between map/unmap can trigger the BUG_ON() in vm_unmap_user_ram.
Is there another scenario I missed ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-16 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-10 19:19 [RFC PATCH for 4.21 00/16] rseq updates, new cpu_opv system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 01/16] rseq/selftests: Add reference counter to coexist with glibc Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-11 10:37 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2018-10-11 15:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-11 16:20 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2018-10-11 16:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-11 17:04 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2018-10-11 19:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-12 9:59 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2018-10-23 14:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 02/16] rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 03/16] sched: Implement push_task_to_cpu (v2) Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-17 6:51 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-10-17 15:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 04/16] mm: Introduce vm_map_user_ram, vm_unmap_user_ram Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-16 18:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-16 19:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-16 19:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-17 0:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-17 15:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-17 15:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-17 15:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 05/16] mm: Provide is_vma_noncached Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 06/16] cpu_opv: Provide cpu_opv system call (v8) Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-16 8:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-16 19:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2018-10-17 1:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-17 7:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-10-17 15:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-17 16:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 07/16] cpu_opv: limit amount of virtual address space used by cpu_opv Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 08/16] x86: Wire up cpu_opv system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 09/16] powerpc: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 10/16] arm: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 11/16] cpu-opv/selftests: Provide cpu-op library Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 12/16] cpu-opv/selftests: Provide basic test Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 13/16] cpu-opv/selftests: Provide percpu_op API Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 14/16] cpu-opv/selftests: Provide basic percpu ops test Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 15/16] cpu-opv/selftests: Provide parametrized tests Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-10 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.21 16/16] cpu-opv/selftests: Provide Makefile, scripts, gitignore Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1984292897.263.1539717457933.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bmaurer@fb.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).