From: Dan Podeanu <pdan@spiral.extreme.ro>
To: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Client receives TCP packets but does not ACK
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:09:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010618010908.A12284@spiral.extreme.ro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010617224015.A8341@spiral.extreme.ro> <200106172113.f5HLDhJ377473@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200106172113.f5HLDhJ377473@saturn.cs.uml.edu>; from acahalan@cs.uml.edu on Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:13:43PM -0400
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:13:43PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> > Is there any logical reason why if, given fd is a connected, AF_INET,
> > SOCK_STREAM socket, and one does a write(fd, buffer, len); close(fd);
> > to the peer, over a rather slow network (read modem, satelite link, etc),
> > the data gets lost (the remote receives the disconnect before the last
> > packet). According to socket(7), even if SO_LINGER is not set, the data
> > is flushed in the background.
> >
> > Is it Linux or TCP specific? Or some obvious techincal detail I'm missing?
>
> The UNIX API (Linux, BSD, Solaris, OSF/1...) requires that you
> put that write() call in a loop, because you can get partial
> writes. Repeat until done... the OS might do 1 byte at a time.
Not so true. The write is completed successfuly, ie.
size == write(fd, buf, size); so the data actually gets to the kernel's
network buffer, only the background polling is not done properly, in the
way I see things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-17 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-15 12:53 Client receives TCP packets but does not ACK Heusden, Folkert van
2001-06-15 18:27 ` Mike Black
2001-06-15 18:39 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-06-15 19:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-17 18:17 ` Pavel Machek
2001-06-17 19:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-17 19:40 ` Dan Podeanu
[not found] ` <200106172113.f5HLDhJ377473@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
2001-06-17 22:09 ` Dan Podeanu [this message]
2001-06-17 22:35 ` dean gaudet
2001-06-18 11:50 ` Jan Hudec
2001-06-18 16:17 ` dean gaudet
2001-06-18 16:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-06-18 22:30 ` dean gaudet
2001-06-18 23:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-06-19 2:46 ` dean gaudet
2001-06-20 21:01 ` David Schwartz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-01 21:27 Nivedita Singhvi
2001-07-11 3:43 ` Robert Kleemann
[not found] <E15BiHy-0002xC-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-06-17 20:21 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106121720310.1152-100000@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-06-13 8:48 ` Andi Kleen
2001-06-13 16:09 ` Robert Kleemann
2001-06-13 0:26 Robert Kleemann
2001-06-15 3:50 ` Robert Kleemann
2001-06-15 12:44 ` Mike Black
2001-06-15 18:29 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-15 23:10 ` Robert Kleemann
2001-06-16 11:55 ` Mike Black
2001-06-16 23:56 ` Robert Kleemann
2001-06-27 1:04 ` Robert Kleemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010618010908.A12284@spiral.extreme.ro \
--to=pdan@spiral.extreme.ro \
--cc=acahalan@cs.uml.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).