From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:35:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:35:54 -0400 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:11537 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:35:53 -0400 Message-Id: <200209261236.g8QCaCp04179@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Denis Vlasenko Reply-To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Further info on underflow in /proc/meminfo Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:30:29 -0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is roughly how it is generated: ... struct sysinfo i; ... si_meminfo(&i); val->bufferram = atomic_read(&buffermem_pages); ... pg_size = atomic_read(&page_cache_size) - i.bufferram; ... sprintf("cached: %d",B(pg_size)); ... On my box I have: # cat /proc/meminfo total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 30322688 27533312 2789376 0 19501056 18446744073699565568 Swap: 100655104 8732672 91922432 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ MemTotal: 29612 kB ... so, page_cache_size-buffermem_pages<0 and after it got scaled pages->bytes we have LARGE "cached:" value! :-) # uname -a Linux pegasus 2.4.18-pre6mhv_ll #2 SMP Wed Mar 27 11:17:36 GMT+2 2002 i686 unknown -- vda