linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
	<linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] consolidate /sbin/hotplug call for pciand usb
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 01:35:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209270135.18010.oliver@neukum.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0209261522340.910-100000@ida.rowland.org>


> This raises a generally interesting question:  When should a driver
> module be loaded?

It is an interesting question, but it is not a kernel problem :-)

[..]
> I think it's clear that the answer must depend on the particular driver,
> and that no single scheme involving usage counts (or the equivalent) can
> suffice for every situation.
>
> Is there a way to let the kernel provide a variety of mechanisms and let
> the device driver (or even the user) select which one gets used?

That is more or less what is in place. There's a kernel aspect to the problem,
because the kernel needs to implement an unload if nothing is bound to method,
as user space cannot do that without a race.

	Regards
		Oliver


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-26 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-25 21:29 [RFC] consolidate /sbin/hotplug call for pci and usb Greg KH
2002-09-25 22:04 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-09-25 22:48   ` Greg KH
2002-09-26  0:11 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2002-09-26  0:25   ` Greg KH
2002-09-26  2:44     ` David Brownell
2002-09-26  4:27       ` Greg KH
2002-09-26 16:14         ` David Brownell
2002-09-26 18:43           ` Greg KH
2002-09-26 19:32             ` David Brownell
2002-09-26 19:34             ` Alan Stern
2002-09-26 23:35               ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2002-09-26 17:48 ` [RFC] consolidate /sbin/hotplug call for pci and usb - take 2 Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200209270135.18010.oliver@neukum.name \
    --to=oliver@neukum.name \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).