linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@transmeta.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com,
	kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:20:22 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020929.172022.23984844.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020930004559.A19071@in.ibm.com>

   From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
   Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:45:59 +0530

   > net_bh_lock: i have removed it, since it would synchronize to nothing. The
   > old protocol handlers should still run on UP, and on SMP the kernel prints
   > a warning upon use. Alexey, is this approach fine with you?
   
   The cache line bouncing of global_bh_lock and net_bh_lock in
   run_timer_tasklet() show up in our profiles, so getting rid of
   them is a good thing (TM).
   
What ancient protocols are you running that make use of this?

IPv4 and IPv6 both do not use it at all.  Even IPX, Appletalk, and
DecNET layers do not use it

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-30  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-29 17:52 [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-29 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 18:50   ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 19:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-29 19:48     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 18:54 ` Dave Jones
2002-09-29 19:15 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30  0:20   ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-09-30  4:33     ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30  4:28       ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30  4:38       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-30 12:55         ` Alan Cox
2002-09-30 14:50           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-29 19:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30  0:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30  6:06   ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 21:45 ` george anzinger
2002-10-01  3:51   ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01  4:18     ` David S. Miller
2002-10-01  5:24       ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01  8:00         ` george anzinger
2002-10-01  5:33     ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-03  7:10     ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 23:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-30 16:38   ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 23:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-30 17:12       ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01  0:43         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020929.172022.23984844.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).