linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	james <jdickens@ameritech.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Larry Kessler <kessler@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew V. Savochkin" <saw@saw.sw.com.sg>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:54:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020930115421.GA979@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10209300235480.13669-100000@master.linux-ide.org>

On Mon, Sep 30 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Sep 29 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 18:42, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > I can say that the IDE code is the same code that is in 2.4.x, so if 
> > > > you're comfortable with 2.4.x wrt IDE, then you should be comfy with 
> > > > 2.5.x too.
> > > 
> > > *NO*
> > > 
> > > The IDE code is the experimental code in 2.4-ac. It is _NOT_ the IDE
> > > code in 2.4 and its a lot less tested. I don't think it has any
> > > corruption bugs but it is most definitely not the base 2.4 code and has
> > > plenty of non corruption bugs (PCMCIA hang, taskfile write hang, irq
> > > blocking performance problems)
> > 
> > 2.5 at least does not have the taskfile hang, because I killed taskfile
> > io.
> 
> Great :-/  Now that you have restored the "rq->wrq" aka working copy of

Make taskfile io work 2.4-ac, and it will work in 2.5 as well. The only
sensible thing to do right now was to disable it in 2.5, imo, and so I
did.

> the request which in its past life under PIO only updated to block when
> the entire request was completed.  So there are no partial completions
> possible given the old method in the legacy path.

I haven't restored anything. 2.4-ac (your base) uses ->wrq copy, so does
2.5.

> One of the issues Linus kick my can over was the "requirement" of partial
> completeions.  What I need rom block is a way to know how much is
> completed of the original total request.  So whatever value is the
> original rq->nr_sectors assigned to "TF.2/HF.2" or nsector_offset(s),
> needs to be carried in block and updated to reflect how much more is
> remaining of this CDB task.

Now that the block layer really can do partial completions properly, I
patched ide-disk to do just that. It's not very well tested, just did it
last week as proof-of-concept.

This breaks the typical offset rules, ie

current_segment_offset = rq->hard_cur_sectors - rq->current_nr_sectors;
total_offset = rq->hard_nr_sectors - rq->nr_sectors;

Haven't though too much about that yet.

> I do not care if you call it "rq->dumbass_accounting_for_andre", but
> provide this dummy accounting variable in "struct request" and I will be
> happy.  This has nothing to do with bio or bh segments from the kernel.
> It is everything about device side accounting carried by block; whereas,
> the ll_driver can use it to determine what or if there is to be another
> interrupt.

What you ask for is already there, but requires that you massage
current_nr_sectors and nr_sectors like ide has always done.

> Why are we getting lost interrupts?
> 
> Because there is a beautiful "data-block completion" v/s "immediate
> interrupt assertion" race between the device and the kernel.  So please
> provide a counter which can be used to determine where the interrupt
> driven partial completion model the driver is wrt the device/request.
> 
> Jens, not asking for much.

Indeed, you are asking for stuff we've had for years.

===== drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 1.16 vs edited =====
--- 1.16/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c	Sat Sep 21 02:32:22 2002
+++ edited/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c	Mon Sep 23 17:18:48 2002
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@
  */
 static ide_startstop_t read_intr (ide_drive_t *drive)
 {
-	ide_hwif_t *hwif	= HWIF(drive);
-	int i = 0, nsect	= 0, msect = drive->mult_count;
+	ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
+	int nsect = 0, msect = drive->mult_count;
 	struct request *rq;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u8 stat;
@@ -174,25 +174,24 @@
 		(unsigned long) rq->buffer+(nsect<<9), rq->nr_sectors-nsect);
 #endif
 	ide_unmap_buffer(rq, to, &flags);
-	rq->sector += nsect;
-	rq->errors = 0;
-	i = (rq->nr_sectors -= nsect);
-	if (((long)(rq->current_nr_sectors -= nsect)) <= 0)
-		ide_end_request(drive, 1, rq->hard_cur_sectors);
+
+	/*
+	 * all done
+	 */
+	if (!ide_end_request(drive, 1, nsect))
+		return ide_stopped;
+
 	/*
 	 * Another BH Page walker and DATA INTERGRITY Questioned on ERROR.
 	 * If passed back up on multimode read, BAD DATA could be ACKED
 	 * to FILE SYSTEMS above ...
 	 */
-	if (i > 0) {
-		if (msect)
-			goto read_next;
-		if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
-			BUG();
-		ide_set_handler(drive, &read_intr, WAIT_CMD, NULL);
-                return ide_started;
-	}
-        return ide_stopped;
+	if (msect)
+		goto read_next;
+	if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
+		BUG();
+	ide_set_handler(drive, &read_intr, WAIT_CMD, NULL);
+	return ide_started;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -203,7 +202,6 @@
 	ide_hwgroup_t *hwgroup	= HWGROUP(drive);
 	ide_hwif_t *hwif	= HWIF(drive);
 	struct request *rq	= hwgroup->rq;
-	int i = 0;
 	u8 stat;
 
 	if (!OK_STAT(stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG),
@@ -217,23 +215,19 @@
 			rq->nr_sectors-1);
 #endif
 		if ((rq->nr_sectors == 1) ^ ((stat & DRQ_STAT) != 0)) {
-			rq->sector++;
-			rq->errors = 0;
-			i = --rq->nr_sectors;
-			--rq->current_nr_sectors;
-			if (((long)rq->current_nr_sectors) <= 0)
-				ide_end_request(drive, 1, rq->hard_cur_sectors);
-			if (i > 0) {
-				unsigned long flags;
-				char *to = ide_map_buffer(rq, &flags);
-				taskfile_output_data(drive, to, SECTOR_WORDS);
-				ide_unmap_buffer(rq, to, &flags);
-				if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
-					BUG();
-				ide_set_handler(drive, &write_intr, WAIT_CMD, NULL);
-                                return ide_started;
-			}
-                        return ide_stopped;
+			unsigned long flags;
+			char *to;
+
+			if (!ide_end_request(drive, 1, 1))
+				return ide_stopped;
+
+			to = ide_map_buffer(rq, &flags);
+			taskfile_output_data(drive, to, SECTOR_WORDS);
+			ide_unmap_buffer(rq, to, &flags);
+			if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
+				BUG();
+			ide_set_handler(drive, &write_intr, WAIT_CMD, NULL);
+			return ide_started;
 		}
 		/* the original code did this here (?) */
 		return ide_stopped;
===== drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c 1.4 vs edited =====
--- 1.4/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c	Fri Sep 20 00:13:51 2002
+++ edited/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c	Mon Sep 23 17:04:47 2002
@@ -611,9 +611,8 @@
 	 * BH walking or segment can only be updated after we have a good
 	 * hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG); return.
 	 */
-	if (--rq->current_nr_sectors <= 0)
-		if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 0))
-			return ide_stopped;
+	if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 1))
+		return ide_stopped;
 	/*
 	 * ERM, it is techincally legal to leave/exit here but it makes
 	 * a mess of the code ...
@@ -669,7 +668,6 @@
 		taskfile_input_data(drive, pBuf, nsect * SECTOR_WORDS);
 		task_unmap_rq(rq, pBuf, &flags);
 		rq->errors = 0;
-		rq->current_nr_sectors -= nsect;
 		msect -= nsect;
 		/*
 		 * FIXME :: We really can not legally get a new page/bh
@@ -677,10 +675,8 @@
 		 * BH walking or segment can only be updated after we have a
 		 * good hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG); return.
 		 */
-		if (!rq->current_nr_sectors) {
-			if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 0))
-				return ide_stopped;
-		}
+		if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 1))
+			return ide_stopped;
 	} while (msect);
 	if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler == NULL)
 		ide_set_handler(drive, &task_mulin_intr, WAIT_WORSTCASE, NULL);
@@ -740,9 +736,9 @@
 	 * Safe to update request for partial completions.
 	 * We have a good STATUS CHECK!!!
 	 */
-	if (!rq->current_nr_sectors)
-		if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 0))
-			return ide_stopped;
+	if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 1))
+		return ide_stopped;
+
 	if ((rq->current_nr_sectors==1) ^ (stat & DRQ_STAT)) {
 		rq = HWGROUP(drive)->rq;
 		pBuf = task_map_rq(rq, &flags);
@@ -802,13 +798,10 @@
 		msect -= nsect;
 		taskfile_output_data(drive, pBuf, nsect * SECTOR_WORDS);
 		task_unmap_rq(rq, pBuf, &flags);
-		rq->current_nr_sectors -= nsect;
-		if (!rq->current_nr_sectors) {
-			if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 0))
-				if (!rq->bio) {
-					stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
-					return ide_stopped;
-				}
+		if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 1)) {
+			/* stat for...? */
+			stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
+			return ide_stopped;
 		}
 	} while (msect);
 	rq->errors = 0;
@@ -922,18 +915,14 @@
 		msect -= nsect;
 		taskfile_output_data(drive, pBuf, nsect * SECTOR_WORDS);
 		task_unmap_rq(rq, pBuf, &flags);
-		rq->current_nr_sectors -= nsect;
 		/*
 		 * FIXME :: We really can not legally get a new page/bh
 		 * regardless, if this is the end of our segment.
 		 * BH walking or segment can only be updated after we
 		 * have a good  hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG); return.
 		 */
-		if (!rq->current_nr_sectors) {
-			if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 0))
-				if (!rq->bio)
-					return ide_stopped;
-		}
+		if (!DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 1, 1))
+			return ide_stopped;
 	} while (msect);
 	rq->errors = 0;
 	if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler == NULL)

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-30 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 212+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-24  1:54 [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAID device driver Larry Kessler
2002-09-24  2:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-26 15:52   ` Alan Cox
2002-09-26 22:55     ` [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice driver Larry Kessler
2002-09-26 22:58       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-26 23:07         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-27  2:27           ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-27  4:45             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-28  7:46               ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-28  9:16                 ` jw schultz
2002-09-30 14:05                   ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-30 10:22                     ` Tomas Szepe
2002-09-30 11:10                       ` jw schultz
2002-09-30 11:17                       ` Adrian Bunk
2002-09-30 19:48                       ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-30 20:30                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-28 15:40                 ` Kernel version [Was: Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice driver] Horst von Brand
2002-09-29  1:31                 ` v2.6 vs v3.0 Linus Torvalds
2002-09-29  6:14                   ` james
2002-09-29  6:55                     ` Andre Hedrick
2002-09-29 12:59                     ` Gerhard Mack
2002-09-29 13:46                       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-09-29 14:06                         ` Wakko Warner
2002-09-29 15:42                         ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-29 16:21                           ` Alan Cox
2002-09-29 16:17                             ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-30  0:39                             ` Jeff Chua
2002-09-29 16:22                           ` Dave Jones
2002-09-29 16:26                             ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-29 21:46                             ` Matthias Andree
2002-09-30  7:05                               ` Michael Clark
2002-09-30  7:22                                 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-30 13:08                                   ` Kevin Corry
2002-09-30 13:05                                 ` Kevin Corry
2002-09-30 13:49                                   ` Michael Clark
2002-09-30 14:26                                     ` Kevin Corry
2002-09-30 13:59                                   ` Michael Clark
2002-09-30 15:50                                     ` Kevin Corry
2002-09-29 17:06                       ` Jochen Friedrich
2002-09-29 15:18                     ` Trever L. Adams
2002-09-29 15:45                       ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-29 15:59                         ` Trever L. Adams
2002-09-29 16:06                           ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-29 16:13                             ` Trever L. Adams
2002-09-30  6:54                               ` Kai Henningsen
2002-09-30 18:40                                 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-01 12:38                                   ` Matthias Andree
2002-10-04 19:58                                     ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-29 17:42                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-29 17:54                       ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-29 18:24                       ` Alan Cox
2002-09-30  7:56                         ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-30  9:53                           ` Andre Hedrick
2002-09-30 11:54                             ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-09-30 12:58                           ` Alan Cox
2002-09-30 13:05                             ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-01  2:17                               ` Andre Hedrick
2002-09-30 16:39                       ` jbradford
2002-09-30 16:47                     ` Pau Aliagas
2002-09-29  7:16                   ` jbradford
2002-09-29  8:08                     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29  8:17                     ` David S. Miller
2002-09-29  9:12                     ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-29 11:19                       ` Murray J. Root
2002-09-29 15:50                         ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-30  7:01                           ` Kai Henningsen
2002-09-29 16:04                         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-09-29 14:56                       ` Alan Cox
2002-09-29 15:38                         ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-29 16:30                           ` Dave Jones
2002-09-29 16:42                           ` Bjoern A. Zeeb
2002-09-29 21:16                           ` Russell King
2002-09-29 21:32                             ` Alan Cox
2002-09-29 21:49                             ` steve
2002-09-29 21:52                           ` Matthias Andree
2002-09-30  7:31                             ` Tomas Szepe
2002-09-30 15:33                           ` Jan Harkes
2002-09-30 18:13                           ` Jeff Willis
2002-09-29 17:48                         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-29 18:13                           ` Jaroslav Kysela
2002-09-30 19:32                       ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-01  6:26                         ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-01  7:54                           ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-10-01  8:27                             ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-01  8:44                               ` jbradford
2002-10-01 11:31                             ` Alan Cox
2002-10-01 11:25                               ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-29 15:34                     ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 17:26                       ` Jochen Friedrich
2002-09-29 17:35                         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-30  0:00                         ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-01 19:28                         ` IPv6 stability (success story ;) Petr Baudis
2002-09-29  9:15                   ` v2.6 vs v3.0 Jens Axboe
2002-09-29 19:53                     ` james
2002-09-29 15:26                   ` Matthias Andree
2002-09-29 16:24                     ` Alan Cox
2002-09-29 22:00                       ` Matthias Andree
2002-09-30 19:02                       ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-30 18:37                   ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-03 15:51               ` [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (WAS Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice) jbradford
2002-10-03 15:57                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-03 16:16                   ` [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (WAS Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem jbradford
2002-10-03 22:30                     ` Greg KH
2002-10-04  6:33                       ` jbradford
2002-10-04  6:37                         ` Greg KH
2002-10-04  7:17                           ` jbradford
2002-10-04  7:30                             ` Greg KH
2002-10-03 16:37                   ` [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (WAS Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice) Alan Cox
2002-10-03 16:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-03 17:40                       ` Alan Cox
2002-10-03 19:55                       ` jlnance
2002-10-03 16:51                   ` Dave Jones
2002-10-03 17:04                     ` Alan Cox
2002-10-03 20:43                     ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-03 22:05                       ` Dave Jones
2002-10-04  3:46                         ` Andreas Boman
2002-10-04  7:44                         ` jbradford
2002-10-03 19:51                   ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-04 22:26                   ` [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA) Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-04 23:13                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-05  0:21                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-05  0:36                         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-05  1:25                           ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-10-05 20:30                       ` The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)) Rob Landley
2002-10-06  2:15                         ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-06  9:42                           ` Russell King
2002-10-06 17:06                             ` Alan Cox
2002-10-06 13:44                           ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-06 15:19                             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-06 15:14                               ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-07  8:08                               ` Helge Hafting
2002-10-07  9:18                                 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-07 14:11                                   ` Jan Hudec
2002-10-07 15:01                                     ` Jesse Pollard
2002-10-07 15:34                                       ` Jan Hudec
2002-10-08  3:12                                         ` [OT] " Scott Mcdermott
2002-10-10 23:49                                           ` Mike Fedyk
2002-10-07 15:15                                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-08 13:49                                   ` Helge Hafting
2002-10-07 17:43                               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-07 18:31                                 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-07 18:51                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-07 20:14                                     ` Alan Cox
2002-10-07 20:31                                       ` The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not3.0 " Andrew Morton
2002-10-07 20:46                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-07 20:44                                       ` The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 " Linus Torvalds
2002-10-07 21:16                                         ` The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not3.0 " Andrew Morton
2002-10-07 23:47                                           ` jw schultz
2002-10-11  0:02                                           ` Mike Fedyk
2002-10-07 18:58                                   ` The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 " Chris Friesen
2002-10-07 19:21                                     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-07 19:35                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-08  0:39                                         ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-08  2:59                                           ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-08 16:15                                             ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-08 19:39                                               ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-08 17:06                                                 ` Rob Landley
2002-10-07 19:36                                     ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-08  2:36                                       ` Simon Kirby
2002-10-08  2:47                                         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-08  2:50                                         ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-08  2:54                                           ` Simon Kirby
2002-10-08  3:00                                             ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-08 16:17                                               ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-08 12:49                                           ` jlnance
2002-10-08 17:09                                             ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-10 20:53                                               ` Thomas Zimmerman
2002-10-08 13:54                                       ` Helge Hafting
2002-10-08 15:31                                         ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-07 19:05                                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-07 19:24                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-07 20:02                                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-07 20:14                                         ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-07 20:22                                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-07 20:28                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-07 21:16                                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-07 21:55                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-07 22:02                                               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-07 22:12                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-08  8:49                                                   ` Padraig Brady
2002-10-07 22:14                                             ` Charles Cazabon
2002-10-30 18:26                                   ` Lee Leahu
2002-10-06  6:33                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-07  5:28                         ` John Alvord
2002-10-07  8:39                         ` The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 n Giuliano Pochini
2002-10-07 13:56                         ` The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)) Jesse Pollard
2002-10-07 14:03                           ` Rob Landley
2002-10-08 22:14                             ` Jesse Pollard
2002-10-08 19:11                               ` Rob Landley
2002-10-09  8:17                             ` Alexander Kellett
2002-10-07 18:22                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-08  8:19                             ` Jan Hudec
2002-10-11 23:53                         ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-11 20:26                           ` Rob Landley
2002-10-12  4:14                             ` Nick LeRoy
2002-10-13 17:27                               ` Rob Landley
2002-10-12 10:03                             ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-13 17:32                               ` Rob Landley
2002-10-13 23:51                                 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-14 16:33                                   ` Rob Landley
2002-10-14  7:10                                 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-10-21 15:36                                   ` [OT] Please don't call it 3.0!! (was Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))) Calin A. Culianu
2002-10-21 16:20                                     ` Wakko Warner
2002-10-12 11:42                             ` The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)) Matthias Andree
2002-10-12 14:56                               ` Hugh Dickins
2002-09-27 11:32       ` [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice driver Alan Cox
     [not found] <fa.e52m04v.plkfqo@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.jgmettv.1hku79s@ifi.uio.no>
2002-09-30  0:16   ` v2.6 vs v3.0 walt
2002-09-30 18:20 John L. Males
     [not found] ` <200209302059.g8UKxQEh007769@darkstar.example.net>
2002-09-30 22:02   ` John L. Males
2002-10-01  2:02     ` Nick Piggin
2002-10-01 11:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-02  7:55 Mikael Pettersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020930115421.GA979@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
    --cc=jdickens@ameritech.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=kessler@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=saw@saw.sw.com.sg \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).