From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:00:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:00:09 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:983 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:00:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:05:17 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Cox Cc: Linus Torvalds , james , Ingo Molnar , Jeff Garzik , Larry Kessler , linux-kernel mailing list , "Andrew V. Savochkin" , Rusty Russell , Richard J Moore Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 Message-ID: <20020930130517.GA23933@suse.de> References: <1033323866.13762.1.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020930075625.GH1014@suse.de> <1033390701.16266.39.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033390701.16266.39.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 30 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 08:56, Jens Axboe wrote: > > 2.5 at least does not have the taskfile hang, because I killed taskfile > > io. > > Thats not exactly a fix 8). 2.5 certainly has the others. Taskfile I/O I didn't claim it was, I just don't want a user setting taskfile io to 'y' because he thinks its cool when we know its broken. > is pretty low on my fix list. The fix isnt trivial because we set the > IRQ handler late - so the IRQ can beat us setting the handler, but > equally if we set it early we get to worry about all the old races in > 2.3.x Where exactly is the race? -- Jens Axboe