From: "Maneesh Soni" <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin.J.Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com"@northrelay01.pok.ibm.com
Subject: Re: 2.5.39-mm1
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 09:28:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210010346.g913ktfP148022@northrelay01.pok.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D9896F6.8E584DC5@digeo.com
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:55:50 +0530, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Martin J. Bligh" wrote:
>>
>> Which looks about the same to me? Me slightly confused.
>
> I expect that with the node-local allocations you're not getting a lot
> of benefit from the lock amortisation. Anton will.
>
> It's the lack of improvement of cache-niceness which is irksome. Perhaps
> the heuristic should be based on recency-of-allocation and not
> recency-of-freeing. I'll play with that.
>
>> Will try
>> adding the original hot/cold stuff onto 39-mm1 if you like?
>
> Well, it's all in the noise floor, isn't it? Better off trying broader
> tests. I had a play with netperf and the chatroom benchmark. But the
> latter varied from 80,000 msgs/sec up to 350,000 between runs. --
Hello Andrew,
chatroom benchmark gives more consistent results with some delay
(sleep 60) between two runs.
Maneesh
--
Maneesh Soni
IBM Linux Technology Center,
IBM India Software Lab, Bangalore.
Phone: +91-80-5044999 email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
http://lse.sourceforge.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-01 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-29 20:26 2.5.39-mm1 Andrew Morton
2002-09-30 1:24 ` 2.5.39-mm1 Ed Tomlinson
2002-09-30 1:35 ` 2.5.39-mm1 Andrew Morton
2002-09-30 7:51 ` 2.5.39-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-30 8:01 ` 2.5.39-mm1 Andrew Morton
2002-09-30 16:29 ` 2.5.39-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-30 18:24 ` 2.5.39-mm1 Andrew Morton
2002-10-01 3:58 ` Maneesh Soni [this message]
2002-10-01 3:51 ` 2.5.39-mm1 Andrew Morton
2002-10-01 4:13 ` 2.5.39-mm1 Maneesh Soni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210010346.g913ktfP148022@northrelay01.pok.ibm.com \
--to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).