From: Shawn <core@enodev.com>
To: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:07:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021003100702.C32461@q.mn.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D9C4FA8.10201@metaparadigm.com>; from michael@metaparadigm.com on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:09:44PM +0800
On 10/03, Michael Clark said something like:
> On 10/03/02 20:38, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 06:50, Michael Clark wrote:
> >
> >>>... and you don't need EVMS for that.
> >>
> >>But EVMS would be an excellent substitute in the mean time.
> >>
> >>Better to having something excellent now than something perfect but
> >>too late.
This statement is misleading; in no way is EVMS intended as an
interim solution to a problem addressed easier in other ways. It's
a fundamental change which happens to address certain critical issues
and also adds functionality whiz-bangs.
> > You can see who around here has maintained kernel code and who hasnt.
> > You don't want a substitute in the mean time, because then you have to
> > get rid of it
>
> Like LVM ;)
Not quite...
> /me submits to the masters and waits in subjugation.
>
> Just hoping for good Volume Manager in 2.6 and EVMS looks good
> to me from an end user perspective, and also seems quite timely.
Me too.
--
Shawn Leas
core@enodev.com
I had a friend who was a clown... when he died, all his friends went to the
funeral in one car...
-- Stephen Wright
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 14:06 [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend) Joe Thornber
2002-10-01 14:15 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-01 14:52 ` venom
2002-10-01 15:48 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-01 16:06 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-01 16:35 ` Joe Thornber
2002-10-01 16:41 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-01 23:19 ` venom
2002-10-01 18:42 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-10-02 1:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-02 4:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-02 13:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-02 14:54 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-10-02 17:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-02 22:29 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-10-02 22:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-02 23:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-02 23:22 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-03 5:50 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-03 12:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-03 14:09 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-03 15:07 ` Shawn [this message]
2002-10-03 15:22 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-06 5:05 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-01 19:12 ` Matthias Andree
2002-10-01 23:25 ` venom
2002-10-01 17:09 ` Status of InterMezzo in 2.5 Andreas Dilger
2002-10-01 14:40 ` [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend) Jens Axboe
2002-10-01 14:54 ` Joe Thornber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021003100702.C32461@q.mn.rr.com \
--to=core@enodev.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=michael@metaparadigm.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).