linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:04:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304201904.h3KJ4IZJ015475@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:51:54 +0200." <20030420105154.GA16451@hh.idb.hist.no>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1997 bytes --]

On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:51:54 +0200, Helge Hafting said:

> > These don't address the problem - if the drive won't go "ready" because
> > of a blown server platter, your data won't get overwritten but it's still
> > readable (a number of companies make good money at this).
> > 
> I see.  Your data is so special that you expect people to pay for
> reconstruction hoping to find something that pays for all
> that trouble and more.

No, I don't consider my data that special - I just say "screw it" and
go looking for the backups.  However, my point is that it's not THAT
hard to salvage data off drives - it's easy enough that companies are
making a living doing it.

The question is regarding sites that are paranoid about shipping out
their data when such recovery is possible.

> Why would it be hard to reach the inner surfaces - the disks
> are not superconducting so the outer ones do not shield the
> inner ones from a strong magnetic field.  You should be fine
> as long as the field extend far enough to get the entire
> drive.  A high-frequency device might have trouble,
> but you don't need that - even a static field will do.

I didn't say it was impossible - I said you had to use a degausser that
was up to the task.  A degausser that is rated to bulk-erase tape media
is probably *NOT* sufficiently strong to do a multi-platter disk.  Most
tapes need 350 Oe or so to bulk, while disks are in the 1500 Oe range.

And you need a really big-ass magnet to make a 1500 Oe field big enough to
cover an entire disk (especially if it's an older disk of the 5.25 or
even larger variety - older IBM mainframe disks were up to 14" platters).

The Canadian government seems to agree - they recommend either getting the
degaussing wand between the platters (page 10) or using a cavity degausser
(page 12).  Note that they do *not* certify cavity degaussers for disk drives
over 3 1/2" with a coercivity over 1100Oe.

http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/200/301/ cse-cst/cse_app-ef/itspl-02.pdf 



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-20 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-19 16:04 Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 15:29 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-19 17:00   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 22:04     ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 16:24       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 13:59     ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 16:55       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 17:12         ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:21           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 18:48             ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 20:00               ` John Bradford
2003-04-21  1:51                 ` jw schultz
2003-04-19 21:13   ` Jos Hulzink
2003-04-20 16:07     ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 16:40       ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:01         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 17:20           ` John Bradford
2003-04-21  9:32             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21  9:55               ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:24                 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 11:50                   ` Alan Cox
2003-04-21 12:14                   ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:22 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:36   ` Russell King
2003-04-19 16:45     ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:52   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 20:04     ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:33       ` Andreas Dilger
2003-04-21  9:25         ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21  9:42           ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 10:25             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 10:50               ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:38       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 14:21         ` John Bradford
2003-04-21  9:09           ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21  9:35             ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:03               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 12:04                 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:22               ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21 11:46                 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 12:13                 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:05     ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 23:13     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-04-19 17:54   ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-04-25  0:07   ` Stewart Smith
2003-04-25  0:52     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-04-25  7:13       ` John Bradford
     [not found] ` <20030419161011$0136@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-04-19 17:18   ` Florian Weimer
2003-04-19 18:07     ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 18:41       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2003-04-19 20:56         ` Helge Hafting
2003-04-19 21:15           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-04-20 10:51             ` Helge Hafting
2003-04-20 19:04               ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2003-04-19 21:57         ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 10:09         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-04-21  8:37         ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-05 12:38         ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-19 22:02     ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20  8:41       ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-25  0:11     ` Stewart Smith
2003-04-20 15:06 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 15:19 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:03 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:25 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:28 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-21  9:36 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 17:28 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:44 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:44 Chuck Ebbert
     [not found] <mail.linux.kernel/20030420185512.763df745.skraw@ithnet.com>
     [not found] ` <03Apr21.020150edt.41463@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2003-04-21 11:19   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 11:52     ` Alan Cox
2003-04-21 14:14     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-05-06  7:03       ` Mike Fedyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200304201904.h3KJ4IZJ015475@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
    --to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).