From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261232AbTEHI5m (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 04:57:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261234AbTEHI5m (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 04:57:42 -0400 Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.6]:43161 "EHLO hirsch.in-berlin.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261232AbTEHI5l (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 04:57:41 -0400 X-Envelope-From: kraxel@bytesex.org Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 11:06:38 +0200 From: Gerd Knorr To: ark925@netscape.net Cc: Kernel List Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20030508090638.GE17300@bytesex.org> References: <053C05D4.4D025D2E.0005F166@netscape.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <053C05D4.4D025D2E.0005F166@netscape.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Actually it does in some cases. I know of two devices that have analog > tuners on an smbus-like interface (OV511 USB TV and W9967CF USB TV). The > tuner can be controlled using a pair of i2c_smbus_write_byte_data() > calls. Hmm, maybe we should rename the SMBUS class to SENSORS or MAINBOARD or something like that? I assumed you smbus interfaces are used for mainboard sensors only ... > Would a patch that adds smbus algorithm support to tuner.c be > acceptable? Yes. Certainly makes more sense than duplicating the whole rest of tuner.c just for a smbus-aware tuner driver ;) Gerd -- sigfault