From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@cox.net>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
sdake@mvista.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:51:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030619005151.GA3411@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EF10705.9090609@cox.net>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:42:45PM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> >But you also have to "hold" events for a bit of time in order to
> >determine that things are out of order, or we have a gap. So a bit of
> >"complex" logic is in the works, but it's much less complex than if we
> >didn't have that sequence number.
> >
>
> OK, so the important point here is that while you probably delay events
> for a small amount of time (1-3 seconds maybe) to ensure that you aren't
> processing steps out of order, it's not likely that userspace is going
> hold event #1321 for an indefinite period of time just because it has
> never seen event #1320.
Exactly.
> I can't wait to see this implementation; it's going to be interesting,
> to say the least. However, without the sequence numbers, it would very
> likely be impossible.
Hey, I still think my originally proposed version would have worked,
eventually... :)
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-19 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-12 19:10 [PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue Steven Dake
2003-06-12 21:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-13 16:31 ` Steven Dake
2003-06-13 17:06 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-12 21:47 ` Greg KH
2003-06-12 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-12 22:50 ` Greg KH
2003-06-12 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-12 23:02 ` Greg KH
2003-06-12 23:09 ` Greg KH
2003-06-12 23:14 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-12 23:16 ` Robert Love
2003-06-12 23:25 ` Greg KH
2003-06-13 20:01 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-18 22:59 ` Greg KH
2003-06-19 0:12 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-06-19 0:20 ` Greg KH
2003-06-19 0:42 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-06-19 0:51 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-06-19 0:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-19 6:27 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-12 23:25 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-12 23:29 ` Robert Love
2003-06-12 23:32 ` Greg KH
2003-06-12 23:34 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-12 23:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-12 23:50 ` Robert Love
2003-06-13 12:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-06-13 12:54 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-06-12 23:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-13 8:41 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-13 11:00 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-13 11:07 ` Herbert Xu
2003-06-13 13:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-13 19:57 ` Joe Korty
2003-06-13 21:10 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-13 11:17 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-13 15:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-12 23:42 ` Robert Love
2003-06-12 23:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-12 23:05 ` Robert Love
2003-06-19 19:51 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-26 12:17 ` Tommi Virtanen
2003-06-26 14:35 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-13 8:40 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-13 9:14 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-06-19 20:53 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-13 16:05 ` Steven Dake
2003-06-13 16:32 ` Greg KH
2003-06-13 15:51 ` Steven Dake
2003-06-13 16:41 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-13 16:42 ` Greg KH
2003-06-13 17:17 ` Chris Friesen
2003-06-12 22:27 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-13 16:03 ` Steven Dake
2003-06-13 16:50 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-13 17:10 ` Steven Dake
2003-06-13 18:26 ` Greg KH
2003-06-13 19:02 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-06-13 17:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-13 18:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-13 18:24 ` Greg KH
2003-06-13 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-13 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-19 23:32 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-19 23:42 ` Steven Dake
2003-06-20 0:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-20 0:10 ` Steven Dake
2003-06-20 0:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-20 2:26 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-20 17:03 ` Steven Dake
2003-06-20 17:18 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-06-14 6:36 John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030619005151.GA3411@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=kpfleming@cox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=sdake@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).