From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261151AbTGKVT1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:19:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261741AbTGKVT0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:19:26 -0400 Received: from natsmtp01.webmailer.de ([192.67.198.81]:48120 "EHLO post.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261151AbTGKVT0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:19:26 -0400 Message-Id: <200307112134.h6BLY7Fg004873@post.webmailer.de> From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.75 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 23:33:40 +0200 References: <7TEe.Bz.21@gated-at.bofh.it> <7TNS.Kc.9@gated-at.bofh.it> User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> No ppc, ppc64, s390? > > Do we have distributions that intend to make releases using those? I > suspect not, but hey, don't get me wrong: I'd love to see them working > out-of-the-box. At the moment, the s390 port is fully merged and functional (~30 known bugs, more to be found) in the your tree, something that has never been the case in 2.2 or 2.4. I expect to see an official debian kernel for s390 2.6.early without any architecture specific patches. The commercial distributions are likely to remain some more time on 2.4.{19,21}, actually there are probably more people still running 2.4.7 than 2.4.19 on s390... Arnd <><