From: Michael Frank <mflt1@micrologica.com.hk>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>,
swsusp-devel <swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:41:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307141141.25149.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1058147684.2400.9.camel@laptop-linux>
On Monday 14 July 2003 09:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Okay.
>
> Having listened to the arguments, I'll make pressing Escape to cancel
> the suspend a feature which defaults to being disabled and can be
> enabled via a proc entry in 2.4.
OK!
I won't add code to poll for ACPI (or
> APM) events :>
Sounds like a reasonable tradeoff
>
> Regards,
>
> Nigel
>
> On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 09:09, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Escape is more intuitively obvious though - I would expect the suspend
> > > button to only start a suspend. And the idea of escape cancelling
> > > anything is well in-grained in peoples' minds.
> >
> > You did not initiate suspend from keyboard => you should not
> > terminate it from keyboard.
> >
Overruled ;)
--
Powered by linux-2.5.75-mm1. Compiled with gcc-2.95-3 - mature and rock solid
My current linux related activities:
- 2.5 yenta_socket testing
- Test development and testing of swsusp for 2.4/2.5 and ACPI S3 of 2.5 kernel
- Everyday usage of 2.5 kernel
More info on 2.5 kernel: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
More info on swsusp: http://sourceforge.net/projects/swsusp/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-14 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-11 22:45 Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 14:00 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-12 14:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 15:37 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-12 19:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 20:15 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-12 20:22 ` [Swsusp-devel] " Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 22:52 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 2:17 ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-12 20:20 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-12 22:56 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 13:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 19:23 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 19:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 18:17 ` [Swsusp-devel] " Michael Frank
2003-07-13 19:29 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-12 22:34 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2003-07-12 22:51 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 13:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 19:31 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 21:01 ` [Swsusp-devel] " Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-13 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 21:21 ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-14 1:54 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 3:41 ` Michael Frank [this message]
2003-07-14 13:11 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-14 17:30 ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-14 18:44 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:12 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-14 20:18 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-14 20:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:43 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-14 21:20 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:41 ` Vojtech Pavlik
[not found] ` <20030714230219.GB11283@elf.ucw.cz>
2003-07-15 6:36 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-15 10:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-15 11:11 ` Markus Gaugusch
2003-07-15 11:31 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.53.0307132305500.1090@phoenix.kerstin.at>
2003-07-14 1:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 1:26 ` Lyle Seaman
2003-07-14 1:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 1:55 ` Lyle Seaman
2003-07-14 1:57 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 2:17 ` Lyle Seaman
2003-07-14 20:10 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-07-14 20:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:29 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-14 20:32 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-14 20:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-15 16:23 ` Kent Borg
2003-07-15 16:27 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-15 17:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-15 19:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307141141.25149.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk \
--to=mflt1@micrologica.com.hk \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).