From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269325AbTGOR6y (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:58:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269223AbTGOR5d (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:57:33 -0400 Received: from genius.impure.org.uk ([195.82.120.210]:23710 "EHLO deviant.impure.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269190AbTGOR4X (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:56:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:11:01 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: Matt Reppert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.0-test1 Message-ID: <20030715181100.GF15505@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Dominik Brodowski , Matt Reppert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030715001132.3b0fd7a5.repp0017@tc.umn.edu> <20030715105657.GA13879@suse.de> <20030715173844.GB1950@brodo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030715173844.GB1950@brodo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:38:44PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > No, please don't do this. There is no function at all in the cpufreq core > which may be called with CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS as arguments. Well, there had > been, many months ago. But it really shall not be defined or used anywhere > outside the 2.4. proc-intf any more. ick, you're right of course. > Now, wrt the ppc-cpufreq driver: benh's 2.5. tree includes a much more > updated version than plain 2.6.0-test1 -- Ben, can you push that to Linus, > please? Also, please change the line > freqs.cpu = CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS; > in do_set_cpu_speed() to > freqs.cpu = 0; > which is the way it should be done now. Ok, CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS is no more in my pending tree. Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt is also out of date and could use an update, but I'm not sure if its just that define thats out of date. Care to give it a read through? Dave