From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.22pre6aa1
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:04:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030718230431.GQ15452@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030718225328.GQ3928@dualathlon.random>
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:53:28AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I tend to think the creation/destruction will be the most noticeable
> performance difference in practice. allocating 42G in a single block
> will take a bit of time ;). I'm not necessairly worse or unacceptable,
> but it's different. And I feel I've to retain the bigpages= API (as an
> API not as in implementation) anyways. Furthmore I'm unsure if hugtlbfs
> is relaxed like the shm-largpeage patch is, I mean, it should be
> possible to mmap the stuff with 4k granularty too, or stuff could break
> due that change of API too.
I've just not gotten feedback about creation and destruction; I get the
impression it's an uncommon operation.
The alignment etc. considerations are bits I probably can't get merged. =(
Most of the work I did was trying to get the preexisting semantics into
more standard-looking API's, e.g. vfs ops and standard-ish sysv shm.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-18 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-17 10:28 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-17 10:42 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 ooyama eiichi
2003-07-17 10:52 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-17 10:53 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 ooyama eiichi
2003-07-17 15:42 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Dave Jones
2003-07-17 20:31 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-17 22:13 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-17 22:26 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-17 22:27 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Mike Fedyk
2003-07-17 22:32 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-17 22:30 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-17 22:50 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-18 0:30 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Chris Mason
2003-07-22 12:28 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-22 14:04 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-18 5:47 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-22 13:34 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-22 13:59 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-24 12:27 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-24 14:14 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Chris Mason
2003-07-18 18:18 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-18 22:27 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-18 22:48 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-18 22:53 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-18 23:04 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-07-18 23:12 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-18 23:53 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-19 0:04 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-23 11:21 2.4.22pre6aa1 Sergey S. Kostyliov
2003-07-25 5:28 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-25 11:10 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Sergey S. Kostyliov
2003-07-25 19:02 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-03 17:12 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Sergey S. Kostyliov
2003-08-16 11:56 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-16 13:54 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Hugh Dickins
2003-08-16 14:00 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Hugh Dickins
2003-08-16 14:50 ` 2.4.22pre6aa1 Sergey S. Kostyliov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030718230431.GQ15452@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).