linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, petero2@telia.com, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Add BTN_TOUCH to Synaptics driver. Update mousedev.
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:24:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309260224.54264.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030925223032.GA32130@ucw.cz>

On Thursday 25 September 2003 05:30 pm, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 01:23:33PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > - Introducing BTN_TOUCH as far as I can seen does nothing to prevent
> > joydev grabbing either Synaptics or touchscreens... Is there a patch
> > missing?
>
> No. It's a statement you're missing near the beginning of
> joydev_connect().
>

Ok.. I see... and I hate it. We have a mechanism to match input devices to
input handler and we violate it. What could be done is adding a black list
to the input handler structure similar to the white list we have now. This
way all matching conditions will be kept in one place...

...But, unless I am missing something again, with introduction of BTN_TOUCH,
tsdev now will happily claim Synaptics touchpads. We could filter it out
by checking for example ABS_PRESSURE in tsdev but it would be just a another
band aid. I could easily see a touch screen reporting pressure and multiple
fingers. As far as capabilities go touchscreens are almost indistinguishable
from touch pads, they just operate as true absolute devices.

IMHO we should let input device driver explicitly request which input
handler it wishes to bind to (for example by passing a bitmap of desired
input handlers when registering input device and everyone binds to evdev). 
It is not as flexible as capabilities checking solution but much more 
simple and predictable. I do not thing that there will be that many handlers 
implemented...

Should I try to cook something along these lines?

> > BTW, any chance on including pass-through patches? Do you want me to
> > re-diff them?
>
> Hmm, I thought I've merged them in already, but obviously I did not.
> Please resend them (rediffed if possible). Thanks.

I meant reconnect patches that Peter sent in his last mail, sorry for the
confusion.

Dmitry

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-26  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-25 16:48 My current patches Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] Revert synaptics->pktcnt change Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 16:50   ` [PATCH 2/8] Fix multibutton handling in synaptics.c Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 16:50     ` [PATCH 3/8] Synaptics code cleanups Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 16:50       ` [PATCH 4/8] Add touchpad support to mousedev.c Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 16:50         ` [PATCH 5/8] Rely less on sanity of AT keyboards Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 16:50           ` [PATCH 6/8] Extend KD?BENT to handle > 256 keycodes Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 16:50             ` [PATCH 7/8] Fix handling of rotated Synaptics touchpads Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 16:50               ` [PATCH 8/8] Add BTN_TOUCH to Synaptics driver. Update mousedev Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 18:23                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2003-09-25 22:30                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26  5:24                     ` Peter Osterlund
2003-09-26  7:24                     ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2003-09-26  7:54                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-27  1:58                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2003-09-27 20:19                         ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-27 21:05                           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-27 21:09                             ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-27 21:16                               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-27 21:18                                 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-27 21:21                                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-27 21:58                                     ` Matt Gibson
2003-09-28  9:49                                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 22:57             ` [PATCH 6/8] Extend KD?BENT to handle > 256 keycodes Andrew Morton
2003-09-25 23:21               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-25 23:38             ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-26  6:20               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-10-05 15:12           ` [PATCH 5/8] Rely less on sanity of AT keyboards Martin Josefsson
2003-09-25 18:13 ` My current patches Peter Osterlund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200309260224.54264.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petero2@telia.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).