From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263600AbTK2CPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:15:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263605AbTK2CPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:15:05 -0500 Received: from adsl-216-102-91-59.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([216.102.91.59]:11709 "EHLO nasledov.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263600AbTK2CPC (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:15:02 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:17:12 -0800 To: William Lee Irwin III , Nigel Cunningham , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: APM Suspend Problem Message-ID: <20031129021712.GA13798@nasledov.com> References: <20031127062057.GA31974@nasledov.com> <20031128212853.GB8039@holomorphy.com> <20031128215008.GA2541@nasledov.com> <20031128215031.GC8039@holomorphy.com> <1070058437.2380.43.camel@laptop-linux> <20031128224928.GD8039@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031128224928.GD8039@holomorphy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Misha Nasledov Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yeah, like I said, if I boot back into 2.4.21 it'll work just fine. I know it worked in -test2 and -test3 but somewhere between then and -test9 it stopped working. It might've been after -test3.. I haven't really looked into using ACPI as APM is supposed to work perfectly on my laptop and I don't want to complicate things.. I wish I knew more about kernel hacking so that I could look into this problem. On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 02:49:28PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:27:17AM +1300, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Dunno if I'm an expert, but I might be able to help. None of the Linux > > based suspends (2.4 or 2.6) will get started unless something like acpid > > pushes them. If a laptop suspends without running acpid or similar, it > > must be doing it from the BIOS. > > apmd is running, though I don't know if it's the one doing it. > > It also seems to be dependent on CONFIG_APM. -- Misha Nasledov misha@nasledov.com http://nasledov.com/misha/