From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264365AbTLBUbj (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:31:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264363AbTLBU2h (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:28:37 -0500 Received: from orion.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.90]:55051 "EHLO orion.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264369AbTLBUTj (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:19:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:24:35 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future Message-ID: <20031202202435.GS15165@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Stephan von Krawczynski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200312011226.04750.nbensa@gmx.net> <20031202115436.GA10288@physik.tu-cottbus.de> <20031202120315.GK13388@conectiva.com.br> <20031202210904.48706476.skraw@ithnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031202210904.48706476.skraw@ithnet.com> X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Organization: Conectiva S.A. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:09:04PM +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski escreveu: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:03:15 -0200 > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Ionut Georgescu escreveu: > > > I can only second that. We've been using XFS here since the days of > > > 2.4.0-testxx and the only problems we've had were sitting between the > > > chair and the keyboard. > > > > So if there is no problems at all using it as a patch why add this to a > > kernel that is phasing out? > > Because it is _not_. So what? You disagree, what is the problem of keeping a patch out of the tree if the tree is getting in deep freeze? > I really wonder how many of you have read this list up to 2.4.11 release ... > > Is there some human-memory-loss-virus flooding the area ? > > Please stay serious. I'm staying, please stay too. And I was on this list _way_ before 2.4.11, 2.6 has, IMHO, a different story. - Arnaldo