From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
pinotj@club-internet.fr, torvalds@osdl.org,
neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, manfred@colorfullife.com, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Oops] i386 mm/slab.c (cache_flusharray)
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:58:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031209235832.GG783@frodo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031209072131.GD24599@lst.de>
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:21:32AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:03:22PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > [ Christoph, is this failure expected? I think you/Steve made
> > some changes there to use __GFP_NOFAIL and assume it wont fail?
> > (in 2.4 we do memory allocations differently to better handle
> > failures, but that code was removed...) ]
>
> It looks like the slab allocator doesn't like __GFP_NOFAIL, we'll
> probably have to revert the XFS memory allocation wrappers to the
> 2.4 versions.
>
OK, thanks - I'll look into it.
cheers.
--
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-09 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-09 0:57 Re: [Oops] i386 mm/slab.c (cache_flusharray) pinotj
2003-12-09 2:03 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-09 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-09 23:58 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2003-12-12 19:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-12 20:07 ` Manfred Spraul
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-04 18:27 pinotj
2003-12-04 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 21:21 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-05 9:34 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-05 3:00 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 6:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 19:19 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-12-04 21:26 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-03 23:06 pinotj
2003-12-03 23:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-29 17:41 pinotj
2003-12-02 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-02 1:37 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-02 6:44 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-02 18:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 20:05 ` Nathan Scott
2003-11-27 18:42 pinotj
2003-11-27 18:55 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-12-02 1:03 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-25 17:30 pinotj
2003-11-25 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-27 18:07 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-22 7:47 Re: " pinotj
2003-11-22 10:55 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-21 18:12 pinotj
2003-11-21 18:58 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-20 1:50 pinotj
2003-11-20 2:09 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-19 18:19 pinotj
2003-11-20 1:07 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031209235832.GG783@frodo \
--to=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=pinotj@club-internet.fr \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).