From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261427AbUK1K4u (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:56:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261428AbUK1K4u (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:56:50 -0500 Received: from levante.wiggy.net ([195.85.225.139]:1715 "EHLO mx1.wiggy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261427AbUK1K4s (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:56:48 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:56:46 +0100 From: Wichert Akkerman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Problem with ioctl command TCGETS Message-ID: <20041128105646.GD22793@wiggy.net> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Previously Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > The syscall should also allow cunking in response, unless we remove all > high-volumne answers from it. Are we reinventing netlink? Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.