linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	ecki-news2004-05@lina.inka.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with ioctl command TCGETS
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:46:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041130154647.GV26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041130132619.GD4670@openzaurus.ucw.cz>

On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:26:19PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Think read(2)/write(2).  We already have several barfbags too many,
> > and that includes both ioctl() and setsockopt().  We are stuck with
> > them for compatibility reasons, but why the hell would we need yet
> > another one?
> 
> Passing structure using read/write is evil, because there's nowhere to hook 
> 32/64 bit translation.

No, really?  And we must use different layouts for 32 and 64 bit platforms
for which religious reasons, exactly?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-30 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-28  0:22 Problem with ioctl command TCGETS Ozan Eren Bilgen
2004-11-28  0:39 ` Al Viro
2004-11-28  9:59   ` Miklos Szeredi
2004-11-28 10:08     ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-28 10:18       ` Miklos Szeredi
2004-11-28 10:28     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-11-28 10:56       ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-11-28 11:52         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-11-28 11:22       ` Miklos Szeredi
2004-11-28 12:18         ` Al Viro
2004-11-28 12:32           ` Miklos Szeredi
2004-11-28 12:48             ` Al Viro
2004-11-28 12:52               ` Miklos Szeredi
2004-11-28 13:03                 ` Al Viro
2004-11-28 14:30                   ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-28 15:27                     ` Al Viro
2004-11-28 18:23                       ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-28 18:51                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2004-12-10  4:01                   ` Ingo Oeser
2004-11-28 13:20                 ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-28 14:05                   ` Al Viro
2004-11-28 13:07           ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-28 13:11             ` Al Viro
2004-11-28 13:19               ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-28 17:42           ` Alan Cox
2004-11-30 13:26           ` Pavel Machek
2004-11-30 15:46             ` Al Viro [this message]
2004-11-28 12:23         ` Bernd Eckenfels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041130154647.GV26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --cc=ecki-news2004-05@lina.inka.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).