From: Norbert van Nobelen <norbert-kernel@edusupport.nl>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Open hardware wireless cards
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:51:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501062151.13882.norbert-kernel@edusupport.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1105044024.15770.7.camel@krustophenia.net>
Err, music, computers: Just spend a lot of time to get a series of thin
clients running sound over a DSL network (now in testing phase, need to solve
some network problems first :-( )
I think the idea for a good sound card is good too, I am only thinking
different about the manufacturing. Ordering 100 cards is not going to be
attractive in any way with price, then just use the conexant wrappers for
windows drivers, and run your card that way. GPL is one issue, wallet content
is the next following important issue.
Wireless cards have to go cheaper all the time. One way to scrape of another
50cents of the manufacturing cost is by using an open developed card en
driver. That way the card will lie in many stores and is easily obtainable
for everybody.
The extra encryption will get the phreaks on board with it, so spreading the
idea of open source development even further, plus it is also a show and tell
to the market like: Open source groups are innovative, and not just copycats
who want everything for free (like in wallet content).
On Thursday 06 January 2005 21:40, you wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 20:06 +0100, Norbert van Nobelen wrote:
> > My personal opinion
> > Sound is mainly integrated on boards. Since developing a high end card is
> > not an easy job, and the market is pretty small for that (enough
> > competition), I think the wireless card is not too weird to do
>
> Yeah but that's all useless to pro audio users. And the market for pro
> audio hardware is a lot more like the general pro audio gear market than
> the computer hardware market. Lower volume, much higher margins.
>
> Compared to the open video card project, this should be a no brainer,
> and that seems to be taking off...
>
> > Plus wireless is hot. What we can do is implement the standard and add a
> > little extra once we are done with that, linux a nice encryption layer
> > for linux to linux communication, thus giving linux (or a windowsbox with
> > the right drivers), a nice edge.
>
> There's a standard for audio-over-firewire but it's inadequate (no
> routing/connection management) so you can't just implement it.
Firewire or USB: I do not care for an antenna for the simple reason that I
just want a powercord (-:
>
> Also making music with computers is pretty hot too if you haven't
> noticed ;-)
>
> Lee
--
<a href="http://www.edusupport.nl">EduSupport: Linux Desktop for schools and
small to medium business in The Netherlands and Belgium</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-06 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050105192447.GJ5159@ruslug.rutgers.edu>
2005-01-05 20:05 ` Open hardware wireless cards Luis R. Rodriguez
2005-01-05 20:14 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-01-05 20:48 ` linux-os
2005-01-05 21:35 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-01-05 21:09 ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-01-08 20:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-09 9:59 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2005-01-09 22:28 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-01-09 23:00 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-05 20:17 ` Raphael Jacquot
2005-01-05 20:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2005-01-06 8:02 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2005-01-06 17:24 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2005-01-06 17:37 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-06 17:38 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2005-01-06 17:42 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-06 19:06 ` Norbert van Nobelen
[not found] ` <1105044024.15770.7.camel@krustophenia.net>
2005-01-06 20:51 ` Norbert van Nobelen [this message]
2005-01-06 17:59 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-06 20:25 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-07 10:37 ` Aaron Lehmann
2005-01-06 19:11 ` Raphael Jacquot
2005-01-06 19:32 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2005-01-06 21:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-06 21:24 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-01-06 21:39 ` Jim Nelson
2005-01-06 21:42 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2005-01-08 11:58 ` Paul Jakma
2005-01-06 21:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-05 20:22 ` [Prism54-users] " Steve Hill
2005-01-05 20:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2005-01-05 22:19 ` christos gentsis
2005-04-19 19:07 ` Karel Kulhavy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501062151.13882.norbert-kernel@edusupport.nl \
--to=norbert-kernel@edusupport.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).