From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Steve Bergman <steve@rueb.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Proper procedure for reporting possible security vulnerabilities?
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:49:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050117194919.A14107@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050111132905.N10567@build.pdx.osdl.net>; from chrisw@osdl.org on Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:29:05PM -0800
Chris Wright wrote:
> +SECURITY CONTACT
> +P: Security Officers
> +M: kernel-security@{osdl.org, vger.kernel.org, wherever}
> +S: Supported
If you mean this in the sense of "choose one, then put it here",
this looks good. If you're suggesting multiple choices, to be
made by the bug reporter, I'm not so sure.
A single contact point, preferably with a human being that can
confirm that the message has been received and understood, and
indicate that there's now somebody taking care of it who knows
what to do (which may just be forwarding it to someone else or
some list, and monitoring the reaction), should be useful.
- Werner
--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-17 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 16:46 Proper procedure for reporting possible security vulnerabilities? Steve Bergman
2005-01-10 18:23 ` Indrek Kruusa
2005-01-10 19:24 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-11 9:32 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-10 21:31 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-10 21:42 ` Steve Bergman
2005-01-10 22:08 ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11 0:19 ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-11 0:45 ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11 9:35 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11 16:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 17:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-01-10 22:09 ` linux-os
2005-01-11 0:44 ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-10 22:11 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 0:40 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11 1:09 ` Diego Calleja
2005-01-11 1:18 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11 17:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 16:39 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-11 21:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-11 21:29 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12 21:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-17 22:49 ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2005-01-17 22:52 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-17 23:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-17 23:26 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-17 23:57 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-18 1:08 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-11 17:57 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12 12:23 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11 9:49 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-11 16:10 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-12 12:33 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-13 15:36 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <200501101959.j0AJxUvl032294@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl>
2005-01-10 21:36 ` Indrek Kruusa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050117194919.A14107@almesberger.net \
--to=wa@almesberger.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steve@rueb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).