From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753036Ab1FIGtS (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 02:49:18 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:39718 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751382Ab1FIGtQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 02:49:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:48:47 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: pageexec@freemail.hu Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Jan Beulich , richard -rw- weinberger , Mikael Pettersson , Andi Kleen , Brian Gerst , Louis Rilling , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64, vsyscalls: Rename UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS to COMPAT_VSYSCALLS Message-ID: <20110609064847.GC7734@elte.hu> References: <4DED6AAC.12348.14E3578E@pageexec.freemail.hu> <20110607095637.GE4133@elte.hu> <4DEEB31B.15655.19E64916@pageexec.freemail.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DEEB31B.15655.19E64916@pageexec.freemail.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * pageexec@freemail.hu wrote: > On 7 Jun 2011 at 11:56, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Fedora was able to disable the fixed-address vdso in its newer 32-bit > > distro kernels because it *upgraded glibc*. > > and what happened to those apps that users statically linked against > the older glibc? what happened to their chroots that had dynamically > linked binaries with an older glibc? did you not break those either? There's two reasons why a distributor will generally not worry about that case: - No such binaries come with a default distro install - Keeping such old libraries linked or chrooted can be a security hole in itself, so i dou guarantee something like this. If another distribution considers this a serious enough issue it can keep the COMPAT_VDSO option enabled forever. Few (none?) did. Thanks, Ingo