From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753607Ab2A3B6g (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:58:36 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:46527 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752390Ab2A3B6f (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:58:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:10:43 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Stephen Warren , Dong Aisheng-B29396 , "Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@linaro.org)" , "Sascha Hauer (s.hauer@pengutronix.de)" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "cjb@laptop.org" , "Simon Glass (sjg@chromium.org)" , Dong Aisheng , Thomas Abraham , "Grant Likely (grant.likely@secretlab.ca)" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2 Message-ID: <20120130021041.GB10470@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1780DAB4CE@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20120123210052.GS22818@atomide.com> <20120126093610.GD2287@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120126175122.GX22818@atomide.com> <20120127071944.GC32740@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120127171653.GI13504@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120127171653.GI13504@atomide.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: ... > I guess the analog we should follow here is clk_get and clk_set_rate, > except we would have pinconf_set_state with predefined states. > It seems working for cases that we only change pinconf but never pinmux for different configuration states. But how would that work for cases that require mux change for different configuration states? -- Regards, Shawn