linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Paul Tuner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add num_to_str() for speedup /proc/stat
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:46:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202084630.748aeb67.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120201144333.GA1542@thinkpad>

On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:43:33 +0100
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:16:19PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
> > index 121f77c..0ff3b92 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/stat.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
> > @@ -89,18 +89,19 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> >  	}
> >  	sum += arch_irq_stat();
> >  
> > -	seq_printf(p, "cpu  %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu "
> > -		"%llu\n",
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(user),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(nice),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(system),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(idle),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(irq),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(steal),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest),
> > -		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
> > +	seq_puts(p, "cpu ");
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(user));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(nice));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(system));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(idle));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(irq));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(steal));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest));
> > +	seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
> > +	seq_putc(p, '\n');
> > +
> >  	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> >  		/* Copy values here to work around gcc-2.95.3, gcc-2.96 */
> >  		user = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_USER];
> > @@ -113,26 +114,24 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> >  		steal = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_STEAL];
> >  		guest = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST];
> >  		guest_nice = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE];
> > -		seq_printf(p,
> > -			"cpu%d %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu "
> > -			"%llu\n",
> > -			i,
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(user),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(nice),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(system),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(idle),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(irq),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(steal),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest),
> > -			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
> > +		seq_printf(p, "cpu %d", i);
>                                ^^^^^^
> mmh... if I'm not wrong this looks like an ABI change.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Andrea
> 
> ---
> From: Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
> Subject: procfs: avoid breaking the ABI in /proc/stat
> 
> The speed up of /proc/stat changed the output of the cpu statistics
> adding an extra space between the string "cpu" and the cpu id.
> 
> Restore the old ABI by removing this space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
> ---
>  fs/proc/stat.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
> index 0ff3b92..7ed7efa 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/stat.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
>  		steal = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_STEAL];
>  		guest = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST];
>  		guest_nice = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE];
> -		seq_printf(p, "cpu %d", i);
> +		seq_printf(p, "cpu%d", i);


Ah, I'm very soory. And thank you very much catching this early !

-Kame


  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-01 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-20 15:59 [PATCH] proc: speedup /proc/stat handling Eric Dumazet
2012-01-20 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-23 10:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-23 10:33   ` Glauber Costa
2012-01-24  1:25     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-25  0:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2012-01-25  0:12   ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-25  0:22     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-25  1:27       ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-25  5:29         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-26  1:04           ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-26  9:55             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-27  0:43               ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-27  1:09                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-27  1:18                   ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-30  5:16                     ` [PATCH] Add num_to_str() for speedup /proc/stat KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-30 23:20                       ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-30 23:58                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-01 14:43                       ` Andrea Righi
2012-02-01 23:46                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-01-27  7:09                   ` [PATCH v2] proc: speedup /proc/stat handling Eric Dumazet
2012-01-25  0:18   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-25  0:26     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-30  8:06       ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2012-01-30  9:25         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-30 10:00           ` Jörg-Volker Peetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120202084630.748aeb67.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea@betterlinux.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).