From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755919Ab2ICD0z (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:26:55 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:44076 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753228Ab2ICD0y (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:26:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 04:26:42 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Jeremy Kerr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming , Matt Domsch Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] efi: Add support for a UEFI variable filesystem Message-ID: <20120903032642.GA21904@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1346319009.951368.767015086462.1.gpush@pecola> <503FA15F.7070506@zytor.com> <50400859.2080606@canonical.com> <5e40036f-b0da-47f3-acba-5dea9fdb7ed6@email.android.com> <50440A5A.900@canonical.com> <9741b1ed-c285-4f89-b60d-337140194345@email.android.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9741b1ed-c285-4f89-b60d-337140194345@email.android.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 06:59:37PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Well, appending is an action, not really a property of the variable that sticks around, no? We could do this for append, but what happens if an attribute with similar variables appears and doesn't neatly map to an O_ option? We can't really argue for limiting attributes purely because they don't map neatly onto POSIX semantics... -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org