linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: "Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"HACHIMI Samir" <shachimi@adeneo-embedded.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] ARM i.MX53: Add pwms to dtsi
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:26:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120907172612.GU26594@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120907132955.GH29340@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:29:55PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:07:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:32:20AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:48:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> [...]
> > > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi        |   14 ++++++++++++++
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c |    4 ++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > > index cd37165..7ec17e4 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > > @@ -189,6 +189,20 @@
> > > >  				status = "disabled";
> > > >  			};
> > > >  
> > > > +			pwm1: pwm@53fb4000 {
> > > > +				#pwm-cells = <3>;
> > > 
> > > pwm-cells should be 2?
> > 
> > Yes, right. We have a patch internally that allows us to pass a
> > 'inverted' flag to the pwm, hence I accidently have 3 here.
> 
> There are patches in for-next that add support for setting the PWM
> polarity, though there's currently no support for specifying it via a
> third cell in the specifier. Would you mind sharing the patches that add
> this?

Yes, will do. I was afraid this leads to some discussion, so I skipped
them so far.

The basic idea was that the third cell is for flags from which bit0 set
means 'inverted'. We currently implemented this i.MX specific, but if
you think this is acceptable it's propably a good idea to implement this
in a generic manner.

Sascha



-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-07 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28 11:48 i.MX pwm patches Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] pwm i.MX: factor out SoC specific functions Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] pwm i.MX: remove unnecessary if in pwm_[en|dis]able Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] pwm i.MX: add functions to enable/disable pwm Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] pwm i.MX: Use module_platform_driver Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:26   ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] pwm i.MX: use per clock unconditionally Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] pwm i.MX: fix clock lookup Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM i.MX53: Add pwms to dtsi Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:32   ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-31 13:07     ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-31  0:16       ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-07 13:29       ` Thierry Reding
2012-09-07 17:26         ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2012-09-07 20:10           ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:28   ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-30 21:45 ` i.MX pwm patches Shawn Guo
2012-08-31 13:05   ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120907172612.GU26594@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shachimi@adeneo-embedded.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).