From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:24:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120927182449.GE8527@x1.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1209271039500.8808@asgard.lang.hm>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:45:06AM -0700, david@lang.hm wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 09:48 -0700, david@lang.hm wrote:
> >>I think you are bing too smart for your own good. you don't know if it's
> >>best to move them further apart or not.
> >
> >Well yes and no.. You're right, however in general the load-balancer has
> >always tried to not use (SMT) siblings whenever possible, in that regard
> >not using an idle sibling is consistent here.
> >
> >Also, for short running tasks the wakeup balancing is typically all we
> >have, the 'big' periodic load-balancer will 'never' see them, making the
> >multiple moves argument hard.
>
> For the initial starup of a new process, finding as idle and remote
> a core to start on (minimum sharing with existing processes) is
> probably the smart thing to do.
Right,
but we don't schedule to the SMT siblings, as Peter says above. So we
can't get to the case where two SMT siblings are not overloaded and the
processes remain on the same L2.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-27 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-14 7:47 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets Nikolay Ulyanitsky
2012-09-14 18:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 18:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 21:27 ` 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 21:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-14 21:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-14 21:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-14 21:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-15 3:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-14 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-14 22:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-14 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-14 22:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 21:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-15 3:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 16:16 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-15 16:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 17:08 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-09-16 4:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 21:32 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-16 4:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-16 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-17 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-17 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-17 10:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-17 14:39 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-19 12:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-19 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-19 15:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-24 15:00 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 15:23 ` Nikolay Ulyanitsky
2012-09-24 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 15:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-24 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-24 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-24 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-25 12:10 ` Hillf Danton
2012-09-24 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-24 16:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-25 13:23 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 18:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-24 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-24 19:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 1:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 2:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-25 2:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 3:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-25 3:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 3:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-25 3:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-25 13:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 17:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-25 18:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-26 2:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-26 17:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-26 2:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-26 2:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-26 2:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-26 17:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-26 16:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-26 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-26 21:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 5:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 5:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 5:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 5:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-27 5:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-27 6:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 6:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-27 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-27 16:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-27 18:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-27 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 19:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-28 3:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-28 12:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-28 4:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-28 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 7:17 ` david
2012-09-27 7:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 10:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 13:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 16:55 ` david
2012-09-27 4:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 16:48 ` david
2012-09-27 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 17:45 ` david
2012-09-27 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-27 18:24 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-09-25 1:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 21:11 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-09-25 4:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 4:11 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <CA+55aFz1A7HbMYS9o-GTS5Zm=Xx8MUD7cR05GMVo--2E34jcgQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-15 4:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 10:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-15 14:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 15:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-15 16:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 19:44 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120927182449.GE8527@x1.osrc.amd.com \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lystor@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).