On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:05:40PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Lee Jones wrote:

> > > > Can we have some closure on this patch please, as it's blocking the
> > > > patch-set? I'm fairly sure the patch is doing the correct thing, as
> > > > seconded by Mark.

> > > I still don't like this. It is the dai_link-struct that bothers me. We have
> > > "ux500-msp-i2s.1" as name of the platform AND the cpu_dai. The MSP I2S-block is
> > > not the platform and it is certainly not both platform and cpu-DAI at the same time.
> > > Mark: Did you have a solution for this? Couldn't we just put NULL on the
> > > platform_name instead?

> > There are other drivers which do this already. 

> > I don't think it's an issue to do this.

> Has anyone had any more bright ideas on how we might handle this?

> The device is still being handled in platform code and I'm desperate
> to get it out of there.

Why do we need any ideas?  Just implement it already.