From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754909Ab2K1RH2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:07:28 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:41141 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751062Ab2K1RH1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:07:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:06:25 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jacob Shin , Andrew Morton , Stefano Stabellini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/46] x86, mm: use pfn_range_is_mapped() with CPA Message-ID: <20121128170625.GJ21266@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1353123563-3103-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1353123563-3103-13-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1353123563-3103-13-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:38:49PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > We are going to map ram only, so under max_low_pfn_mapped, > between 4g and max_pfn_mapped does not mean mapped at all. I think I know what you are saying but I am having a hard time parsing it. Is this what you mean? "We check to see if the PFNs are under max_low_pfn_mapped or between 4G and max_pfn_mapped. If they are not: then we map them." ? > > Use pfn_range_is_mapped() directly. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > --- > arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 16 +++------------- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c > index a718e0d..44acfcd 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c > @@ -551,16 +551,10 @@ static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address) > for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++, pfn += pfninc) > set_pte(&pbase[i], pfn_pte(pfn, ref_prot)); > > - if (address >= (unsigned long)__va(0) && > - address < (unsigned long)__va(max_low_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT)) > + if (pfn_range_is_mapped(PFN_DOWN(__pa(address)), > + PFN_DOWN(__pa(address)) + 1)) > split_page_count(level); > > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > - if (address >= (unsigned long)__va(1UL<<32) && > - address < (unsigned long)__va(max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT)) > - split_page_count(level); > -#endif > - > /* > * Install the new, split up pagetable. > * > @@ -729,13 +723,9 @@ static int cpa_process_alias(struct cpa_data *cpa) > unsigned long vaddr; > int ret; > > - if (cpa->pfn >= max_pfn_mapped) > + if (!pfn_range_is_mapped(cpa->pfn, cpa->pfn + 1)) > return 0; > > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > - if (cpa->pfn >= max_low_pfn_mapped && cpa->pfn < (1UL<<(32-PAGE_SHIFT))) > - return 0; > -#endif > /* > * No need to redo, when the primary call touched the direct > * mapping already: > -- > 1.7.7