From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>,
Linux ARM Kernel ML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: One of these things (CONFIG_HZ) is not like the others..
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:27:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301220827.55209.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130121224449.GZ23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Monday 21 January 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> In this particular case, EBSA110 is not a candidate for multi-arch
> build anyway, because it's ARMv4 and we're only really bothering with
> ARMv6 and better.
>
> Not only that, but the IO stuff on it is sufficiently obscure and
> non-standard...
Right, no point worrying about EBSA110. We need to work out OMAP and
Exynos/S5P though: As long as OMAP needs 128HZ and Exynos needs 200HZ,
we can never have them in the same kernel.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-21 20:01 One of these things (CONFIG_HZ) is not like the others Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 20:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-21 21:00 ` John Stultz
2013-01-21 21:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-21 22:18 ` John Stultz
2013-01-21 22:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-22 8:27 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-01-21 22:20 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 22:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-21 23:23 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 23:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-22 0:09 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-22 0:26 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 21:14 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 22:36 ` John Stultz
2013-01-21 22:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-21 22:54 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 23:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-21 23:30 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-22 0:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-22 0:38 ` John Stultz
2013-01-22 0:51 ` John Stultz
2013-01-22 1:06 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-22 1:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-22 1:56 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-22 1:31 ` John Stultz
2013-01-22 2:10 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-31 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-01-21 21:02 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 22:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-21 22:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-21 23:01 ` Matt Sealey
2013-01-21 21:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-21 23:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-01-22 6:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-22 9:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-22 10:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-22 14:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-22 15:05 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-28 6:08 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-29 0:01 ` John Stultz
2013-01-29 6:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-29 10:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-29 18:43 ` John Stultz
2013-01-22 17:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-22 18:59 ` John Stultz
2013-01-22 21:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-01-23 5:18 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301220827.55209.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=matt@genesi-usa.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).