From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
Maneesh Soni <maneesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ptrace/x86: dont delay perf_event_disable() till second pass in ptrace_write_dr7()
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:40:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130417124056.GA7359@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFTL4hzzrqnm4TixUsCf57Xu+AHfSe26OToOo4y=RJzqF8FREg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/17, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> 2013/4/16 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>:
> >
> > Well, I disagree.
> >
> > To clarify, I agree with WARN_ON_ONCE(), but afaics it has nothing to
> > do with "second_pass",
> >
> >> And these are indeed supposed
> >> to.
> >
> > Indeed, but this is because ptrace_modify_breakpoint() should not fail.
> >
> > So, what do you think if I change the main loop above
> >
> > rc = ptrace_modify_breakpoint(...)
> > - if (rc)
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rc))
> > break;
>
> It can fail in the first pass if dr7 is incorrect. For example passing
> a length
^^^^^^
Oops. Indeed, I forgot that ptrace_modify_breakpoint() has other arguments,
not only "disabled" ;)
Thanks for correcting me.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-14 19:12 [PATCH 0/2] ptrace/x86: simplify ptrace_write_dr7() Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-14 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] ptrace/x86: simplify the "disable" logic in ptrace_write_dr7() Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-16 0:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-14 19:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] ptrace/x86: dont delay perf_event_disable() till second pass " Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-16 0:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-16 13:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-16 22:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-17 12:40 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-04-14 19:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] ptrace/x86: simplify ptrace_write_dr7() Jan Kratochvil
2013-04-14 19:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-15 23:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-16 13:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-17 4:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130417124056.GA7359@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maneesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).