From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: 3.14.0+/x86: lockdep and mutexes not getting along
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:26:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140410232652.GA24658@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397150084.3032.4.camel@j-VirtualBox>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:14:44AM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:42:59PM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > > As a starting point, would either of you like to test the following
> > > patch to see if it fixes the issue? This patch essentially generates the
> > > same code as in older kernels in the debug case. This applies on top of
> > > kernels with both commits 6f008e72cd11 and 1d8fe7dc8078.
> >
> >
> > So I managed to reproduce, and the below makes it go away. I just don't
> > understand why though. will stare more.
>
> So one thing I noticed that is different in the current code is that in
> debug_mutex_unlock(), there is is a possibility that it does not unlock
> the mutex (when !debug_locks). May be interesting to try out this
> patch too:
I've been seeing lockups this last week or two too, that manifested by
RCU spewing stall messages, and the box being totally unresponsive.
This patch seems to cure that for me, which I'm sure will make Paul
happy to hear.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-06 5:12 3.14.0+/x86: lockdep and mutexes not getting along Michael L. Semon
2014-04-09 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-04-10 5:42 ` Jason Low
2014-04-10 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 9:15 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-04-10 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 13:59 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-04-14 7:22 ` [tip:core/urgent] locking/mutex: Fix debug_mutexes tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 17:14 ` 3.14.0+/x86: lockdep and mutexes not getting along Jason Low
2014-04-10 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 19:04 ` Jason Low
2014-04-10 23:26 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2014-04-10 23:30 ` Dave Jones
2014-04-11 3:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-11 13:41 ` Michael L. Semon
2014-04-10 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 14:29 ` cred_guard_mutex vs seq_file::lock [was: Re: 3.14.0+/x86: lockdep and mutexes not getting along] Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 14:50 ` David Howells
2014-04-11 15:07 ` Al Viro
2014-07-30 22:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-30 23:03 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-07-31 7:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140410232652.GA24658@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mlsemon35@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).