From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
tangchen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: fixup existing pool->node
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 15:14:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141225201406.GB22951@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548E3825.9020204@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:23:49AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> The pwqs of the old node's cpumask do be discarded. But the pools of the old
> node's cpumask maybe recycle. For example, a new workqueue's affinity is set to
> the old node's cpumask before the pool is dead. Any old pool can long live.
Hah? Why can't it just be unhashed so that it can't be looked up for
new pwqs anymore?
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-25 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-12 10:19 [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: fix memory leak in wq_numa_init() Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 5:25 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: update wq_numa_possible_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:18 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 2:02 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:16 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-18 2:22 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: fixup existing pool->node Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 1:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:14 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-01-13 7:08 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-13 15:24 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] workqueue: update NUMA affinity for the node lost CPU Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:27 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 1:28 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:17 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: retry on NUMA_NO_NODE when create_worker() fails Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 16:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-12-12 17:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-12-12 17:29 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-12-15 1:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-18 1:50 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-12-13 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed v2 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: add a hook for node hotplug Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: add warning if pool->node is offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: remove per-node unbound pool when node goes offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 2:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 2:06 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: handle change in cpu-node relationship Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 2:12 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 2:20 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 2:48 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 2:55 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 3:30 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 3:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 4:04 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 5:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 5:33 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue: fix memory allocation after numa mapping is changed v3 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue:Fix unbound workqueue's node affinity detection Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 5:30 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16 7:32 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 7:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 11:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: update per-cpu workqueue's node affinity at,online-offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 5:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16 7:25 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: Update workqueue's possible cpumask when a new node, coming up Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 7:49 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16 8:10 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 8:18 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: Handle cpu-node affinity change at CPU_ONLINE Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141225201406.GB22951@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).