From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Add missing include file
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:24:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150330032413.GA26566@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426237126-9700-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:58:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with
>
> fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_IO':
> fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iov_iter_alignment'
>
> due to a missing include file.
>
> Fixes: 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h")
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
This problem still affects the following builds as of today.
alpha:allmodconfig
i386:allyesconfig
i386:allmodconfig
m68k:allmodconfig
mips:allmodconfig
xtensa:allmodconfig
and thus probabably many other allmodconfig builds which I don't try to build.
This is getting really annoying, and prevents us from finding and fixing
other build problems.
It has been more than two weeks since I submitted the patch. This suggests
that the patch got lost otr that the Powers That Be don't care. Which one
is it ?
Should I request to revert 3737c63e1fb0 instead ?
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-30 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 8:58 [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Add missing include file Guenter Roeck
2015-03-13 9:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-13 9:14 ` David Sterba
2015-03-30 3:24 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-04-01 19:28 ` Chris Mason
2015-04-01 19:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-01 20:03 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150330032413.GA26566@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).