linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Subject: [V4 PATCH 1/4] panic/x86: Fix re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 20:28:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150925112805.4258.97380.stgit@softrs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150925112803.4258.94241.stgit@softrs>

If panic on NMI happens just after panic() on the same CPU, panic()
is recursively called.  As the result, it stalls after failing to
acquire panic_lock.

To avoid this problem, don't call panic() in NMI context if
we've already entered panic().

V4:
- Improve comments in io_check_error() and panic()

V3:
- Introduce nmi_panic() macro to reduce code duplication
- In the case of panic on NMI, don't return from NMI handlers
  if another cpu already panicked

V2:
- Use atomic_cmpxchg() instead of current spin_trylock() to
  exclude concurrent accesses to the panic routines
- Don't introduce no-lock version of panic()

Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c  |   16 ++++++++++++----
 include/linux/kernel.h |   13 +++++++++++++
 kernel/panic.c         |   15 ++++++++++++---
 kernel/watchdog.c      |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
index 697f90d..5131714 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, const char *name)
 #endif
 
 	if (panic_on_unrecovered_nmi)
-		panic("NMI: Not continuing");
+		nmi_panic("NMI: Not continuing");
 
 	pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n");
 
@@ -255,8 +255,16 @@ void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, const char *name)
 		 reason, smp_processor_id());
 	show_regs(regs);
 
-	if (panic_on_io_nmi)
-		panic("NMI IOCK error: Not continuing");
+	if (panic_on_io_nmi) {
+		nmi_panic("NMI IOCK error: Not continuing");
+
+		/*
+		 * If we return from nmi_panic(), it means we have received
+		 * NMI while processing panic().  So, simply return without
+		 * a delay and re-enabling NMI.
+		 */
+		return;
+	}
 
 	/* Re-enable the IOCK line, wait for a few seconds */
 	reason = (reason & NMI_REASON_CLEAR_MASK) | NMI_REASON_CLEAR_IOCHK;
@@ -297,7 +305,7 @@ void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, const char *name)
 
 	pr_emerg("Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?\n");
 	if (unknown_nmi_panic || panic_on_unrecovered_nmi)
-		panic("NMI: Not continuing");
+		nmi_panic("NMI: Not continuing");
 
 	pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n");
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index 5582410..57c33da 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -443,6 +443,19 @@ extern __scanf(2, 0)
 
 extern bool crash_kexec_post_notifiers;
 
+extern atomic_t panic_cpu;
+
+/*
+ * A variant of panic() called from NMI context.
+ * If we've already panicked on this cpu, return from here.
+ */
+#define nmi_panic(fmt, ...)						\
+	do {								\
+		int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();			\
+		if (atomic_cmpxchg(&panic_cpu, -1, this_cpu) != this_cpu) \
+			panic(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);			\
+	} while (0)
+
 /*
  * Only to be used by arch init code. If the user over-wrote the default
  * CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT, honor it.
diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
index 04e91ff..a105e67 100644
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ void __weak panic_smp_self_stop(void)
 		cpu_relax();
 }
 
+atomic_t panic_cpu = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
+
 /**
  *	panic - halt the system
  *	@fmt: The text string to print
@@ -70,17 +72,17 @@ void __weak panic_smp_self_stop(void)
  */
 void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
 {
-	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(panic_lock);
 	static char buf[1024];
 	va_list args;
 	long i, i_next = 0;
 	int state = 0;
+	int old_cpu, this_cpu;
 
 	/*
 	 * Disable local interrupts. This will prevent panic_smp_self_stop
 	 * from deadlocking the first cpu that invokes the panic, since
 	 * there is nothing to prevent an interrupt handler (that runs
-	 * after the panic_lock is acquired) from invoking panic again.
+	 * after setting panic_cpu) from invoking panic again.
 	 */
 	local_irq_disable();
 
@@ -93,8 +95,15 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
 	 * multiple parallel invocations of panic, all other CPUs either
 	 * stop themself or will wait until they are stopped by the 1st CPU
 	 * with smp_send_stop().
+	 *
+	 * `old_cpu == -1' means this is the 1st CPU which comes here, so
+	 * go ahead.
+	 * `old_cpu == this_cpu' means we came from nmi_panic() which sets
+	 * panic_cpu to this cpu.  In this case, this is also the 1st CPU.
 	 */
-	if (!spin_trylock(&panic_lock))
+	this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+	old_cpu = atomic_cmpxchg(&panic_cpu, -1, this_cpu);
+	if (old_cpu != -1 && old_cpu != this_cpu)
 		panic_smp_self_stop();
 
 	console_verbose();
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 64ed1c3..00fbaa29 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event,
 			return;
 
 		if (hardlockup_panic)
-			panic("Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu %d",
+			nmi_panic("Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu %d",
 			      this_cpu);
 		else
 			WARN(1, "Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu %d",



  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-25 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-25 11:28 [V4 PATCH 0/4] Fix race issues among panic, NMI and crash_kexec Hidehiro Kawai
2015-09-25 11:28 ` Hidehiro Kawai [this message]
2015-09-25 12:13   ` [V4 PATCH 1/4] panic/x86: Fix re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-09-30 11:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01  1:02       ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-09-25 11:28 ` [V4 PATCH 2/4] panic/x86: Allow cpus to save registers even if they are looping in NMI context Hidehiro Kawai
2015-09-30 11:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01  1:43     ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-09-25 11:28 ` [V4 PATCH 3/4] kexec: Fix race between panic() and crash_kexec() called directly Hidehiro Kawai
2015-09-28  3:53   ` kbuild test robot
2015-09-28  7:08     ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-09-30 11:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01  2:04         ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-09-28  4:02   ` kbuild test robot
2015-09-28  4:46     ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-09-25 11:28 ` [V4 PATCH 4/4] x86/apic: Introduce noextnmi boot option Hidehiro Kawai
2015-09-30 11:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01  2:33     ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-01  6:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01  7:01         ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-01  8:43           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-01 10:24             ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-01 11:01               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-02  0:58                 ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-02  7:47                   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-05  2:03                     ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-05  8:27                       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-05  9:21                         ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-05 10:14                           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-13 11:55                             ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
     [not found]                         ` <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510132210590.25029@nanos>
2015-10-14 13:54                           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-16  1:58                             ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-13 20:22   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14  3:39     ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
     [not found]       ` <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510140924370.25029@nanos>
2015-10-16  2:02         ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-27  8:46   ` Baoquan He
2015-10-27  9:01     ` 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
2015-10-27  9:06       ` 'Baoquan He'

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150925112805.4258.97380.stgit@softrs \
    --to=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).