From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:12:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160222231232.GD25240@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CB1C72.2000603@oracle.com>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:34:26AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 05:27 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> >>index 1ae89a2721d6..fe0d579b63e3 100644
> >>--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> >>+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> >>@@ -84,11 +84,14 @@ struct x86_init_paging {
> >> * boot cpu
> >> * @timer_init: initialize the platform timer (default PIT/HPET)
> >> * @wallclock_init: init the wallclock device
> >>+ * @no_cmos_rtc: set when platform has no CMOS real-time clock
> >>+ * present
> >> */
> >> struct x86_init_timers {
> >> void (*setup_percpu_clockev)(void);
> >> void (*timer_init)(void);
> >> void (*wallclock_init)(void);
> >>+ bool no_cmos_rtc;
> >I'd add
> >
> > u64 flags;
> >
> >to x86_init_ops and then set X86_PLATFORM_NO_RTC or so in there. The
> >reason being, others could use that flags field too, for other stuff and
> >define more bits.
>
> Maybe timer_flags or platform_flags (or something else) to be a
> little more cscope-friendly?
Sure, I'll go with platform_flags on x86_init_ops. Will repost a new
series after 0-day testing.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-22 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 13:08 [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2016-02-19 13:40 ` David Vrabel
2016-02-19 14:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/init: make ebda depend on PC subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 15:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-19 20:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 22:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-20 0:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 14:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/cpu/intel: replace paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2016-02-19 14:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 6:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-22 14:34 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-22 23:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2016-02-19 13:27 ` David Vrabel
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 9/9] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch checks Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:34 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible David Vrabel
2016-02-19 14:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160222231232.GD25240@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).