From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com,
maxime.coquelin@st.com, ohad@wizery.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:16:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160510141658.GP19473@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160506184842.GE1256@tuxbot>
On Fri, 06 May 2016, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 05 May 06:29 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > - of_rproc_byindex(): look-up and obtain a reference to a rproc
> > using the DT phandle "rprocs" and a index.
> >
> > - of_rproc_byname(): lookup and obtain a reference to a rproc
> > using the DT phandle "rprocs" and "rproc-names".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
>
> I like the idea of having these helpers, but we already have
> rproc_get_by_phandle() so these helpers should be built upon that rather
> than adding the additional list.
Since this is a framework consideration, don't you think it would be
better to standardise the phandle name? This is common practice when
coding at a subsystem level. Some in use examples include; "clocks",
"power-domains", "mboxes", "dmas", "phys", "resets", "gpios", etc.
Considering the aforementioned examples, I figured "rprocs" would be
suitable.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-05 13:29 [PATCH 0/5] remoteproc: A few important improvements Lee Jones
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] remoteproc: core: Task sync during rproc_fw_boot() Lee Jones
2016-05-06 18:44 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions Lee Jones
2016-05-06 18:48 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-10 14:16 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-05-10 18:48 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-07-13 19:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-07-14 6:53 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] remoteproc: core: Add ability to select a firmware from the client Lee Jones
2016-05-06 18:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-10 13:02 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: core: Supply framework to request, declare and fetch shared memory Lee Jones
2016-05-11 22:30 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-06-15 22:06 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-06-21 7:33 ` [STLinux Kernel] " loic pallardy
2016-06-22 16:21 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: core: Clip carveout if it's too big Lee Jones
2016-05-10 19:21 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-06-17 19:53 ` [STLinux Kernel] " loic pallardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160510141658.GP19473@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.barre@st.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).