On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:16:27AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > On 14/06/16 16:59, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 07:18:45PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > > > +config SND_SOC_MSM8916_WCD > > > + tristate "Qualcomm MSM8916 WCD" > > > + depends on SPMI && MFD_SYSCON > > Normally users select MFD_SYSCON. > This driver is child of spmi bus so, we need SPMI dependency here along with > SYSCON. That does not seem relevant to the problem with depending on MFD_SYSCON. > > > +#include "msm8916-wcd-registers.h" > > > +#include "msm8916-wcd.h" > > > +#include "dt-bindings/sound/msm8916-wcd.h" > > What's in here? There weren't any constants in the bindings. > Yes, there are DAI id's which are used in device trees. That doesn't make them present in the binding document... > > Why is this one device and not two devices? The description indicated > > that this was two separate bits of silicon. > In theory there are 3 devices, > one is the pmic-spmi driver, which provides regmap access to analog part of > codec registers. > second is syscon driver which provides regmap access to digital parts of > codec to codec driver. > third is the codec driver which uses both the above. > Codec registers range is just split into two, range 0x0- 0x200 sits in pmic > address space and range 0x201 - 0x4ff in the SOC address space, > Are there any other better ways to model this kinda driver? Why not just have separate devices for each of the register maps? > > > +static const struct of_device_id msm8916_wcd_match_table[] = { > > > + {.compatible = "qcom,msm8916-pmic-wcd-codec"}, > > > + {} > > > +}; > > We were peering inside the parent for the register map, why does this > I think that's the only way/interface to access PMIC spmi registers I guess. Don't guess, understand what the code is doing. > > appear in the device tree as a separate device? Both the patch > This node is child of spmi bus, like the other spmi devices. If this is a SPMI device it needs to register a SPMI device not a platform device.