linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Yaowei Bai" <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@amazon.com>,
	"Jan H . Schönherr" <jschoenh@amazon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparse: Track the boundaries of memory sections for accurate checks
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:23:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620082339.GC4340@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466244679-23824-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de>

On Sat 18-06-16 12:11:19, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> When sparse memory model is used an array of memory sections is created to
> track each block of contiguous physical pages. Each element of this array
> contains PAGES_PER_SECTION pages. During the creation of this array the actual
> boundaries of the memory block is lost, so the whole block is either considered
> as present or not.
> 
> pfn_valid() in the sparse memory configuration checks which memory sections the
> pfn belongs to then checks whether it's present or not. This yields sub-optimal
> results when the available memory doesn't cover the whole memory section,
> because pfn_valid will return 'true' even for the unavailable pfns at the
> boundaries of the memory section.

Please be more verbose of _why_ the patch is needed. Why those
"sub-optimal results" matter?

> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@amazon.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/mmzone.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>  mm/sparse.c            | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 02069c2..f76a0e1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1067,8 +1067,12 @@ struct mem_section {
>  	 * section. (see page_ext.h about this.)
>  	 */
>  	struct page_ext *page_ext;
> -	unsigned long pad;
> +	unsigned long pad[3];
>  #endif
> +
> +	unsigned long first_pfn;
> +	unsigned long last_pfn;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * WARNING: mem_section must be a power-of-2 in size for the
>  	 * calculation and use of SECTION_ROOT_MASK to make sense.
> @@ -1140,23 +1144,29 @@ static inline int valid_section_nr(unsigned long nr)
>  
>  static inline struct mem_section *__pfn_to_section(unsigned long pfn)
>  {
> +	if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
> +		return NULL;
> +
>  	return __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
>  }
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
>  static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
>  {
> -	if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
> +	struct mem_section *ms;
> +
> +	ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> +
> +	if (ms && !(ms->first_pfn <= pfn && ms->last_pfn >= pfn))
>  		return 0;
> -	return valid_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)));
> +
> +	return valid_section(ms);
>  }
>  #endif
>  
>  static inline int pfn_present(unsigned long pfn)
>  {
> -	if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
> -		return 0;
> -	return present_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)));
> +	return present_section(__pfn_to_section(pfn));
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 5d0cf45..3c91837 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -166,24 +166,59 @@ void __meminit mminit_validate_memmodel_limits(unsigned long *start_pfn,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static int __init
> +overlaps(u64 start1, u64 end1, u64 start2, u64 end2)
> +{
> +	u64 start, end;
> +
> +	start = max(start1, start2);
> +	end = min(end1, end2);
> +	return start <= end;
> +}
> +
>  /* Record a memory area against a node. */
>  void __init memory_present(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  {
> +	unsigned long first_pfn = start;
>  	unsigned long pfn;
>  
>  	start &= PAGE_SECTION_MASK;
>  	mminit_validate_memmodel_limits(&start, &end);
>  	for (pfn = start; pfn < end; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>  		unsigned long section = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
> +		unsigned long last_pfn = min(pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION, end) - 1;
>  		struct mem_section *ms;
>  
>  		sparse_index_init(section, nid);
>  		set_section_nid(section, nid);
>  
>  		ms = __nr_to_section(section);
> -		if (!ms->section_mem_map)
> +		if (!ms->section_mem_map) {
>  			ms->section_mem_map = sparse_encode_early_nid(nid) |
>  							SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT;
> +		} else {
> +			/* Merge the two regions */
> +			WARN_ON(sparse_early_nid(ms) != nid);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * If they don't overlap there will be a hole in
> +			 * between where meta-data says it's valid even though
> +			 * it's not.
> +			 */
> +			if (!overlaps(first_pfn, last_pfn + 1,
> +				      ms->first_pfn, ms->last_pfn + 1))	{
> +				pr_info("Merging non-contiguous pfn ranges 0x%lx-0x%lx and 0x%lx-0x%lx\n",
> +					ms->first_pfn, ms->last_pfn,
> +					first_pfn, last_pfn);
> +			}
> +			first_pfn = min(first_pfn, ms->first_pfn);
> +			last_pfn = max(last_pfn, ms->last_pfn);
> +		}
> +
> +		ms->first_pfn = first_pfn;
> +		ms->last_pfn = last_pfn;
> +
> +		first_pfn = pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.8.2
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-20  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-18 10:11 [PATCH] sparse: Track the boundaries of memory sections for accurate checks KarimAllah Ahmed
2016-06-20  8:23 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-06-21 14:33   ` [PATCH v2] " KarimAllah Ahmed
2016-09-14 21:40   ` [PATCH] " Raslan, KarimAllah
2016-09-14 22:05     ` Dan Williams
2016-09-14 22:11       ` Raslan, KarimAllah
2016-09-14 22:53         ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160620082339.GC4340@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
    --cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=jschoenh@amazon.de \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).